{"id":1021,"date":"2010-06-08T14:09:04","date_gmt":"2010-06-08T11:09:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=1021"},"modified":"2010-06-08T14:09:07","modified_gmt":"2010-06-08T11:09:07","slug":"google-kararina-itiraz-bu-dolayli-sansurdur-ntvmsnbc-com","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=1021","title":{"rendered":"Google karar\u0131na itiraz: Bu dolayl\u0131 sans\u00fcrd\u00fcr &#8211; ntvmsnbc.com"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ntvmsnbc.com\/id\/25104169\/\">Google karar\u0131na itiraz: Bu dolayl\u0131 sans\u00fcrd\u00fcr &#8211; \u0130nternet- ntvmsnbc.com<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p>\u0130ki hukuk\u00e7u, YouTube eri\u015fim yasa\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerinden Google&#8217;a eri\u015fimi de zorla\u015ft\u0131rman\u0131n yasalara ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu iddia ederek itirazda bulundu.<br \/>\n \u0130li\u015fkili foto\u011fraflar\u0131 g\u00f6ster<\/p>\n<p>ntvmsnbc, G\u00fcncelleme: 11:57 TS\u0130 08 Haziran. 2010 Sal\u0131<\/p>\n<p>Pek \u00e7ok Google servislerine T\u00fcrkiye\u2019den ula\u015f\u0131m\u0131 zorla\u015ft\u0131ran IP engelleme karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 itirazda bulunuldu. \u0130ki hukuk\u00e7unun Bilgi Teknolojileri ve \u0130leti\u015fim Kurumu\u2019na verdikleri dilek\u00e7ede, Google hakk\u0131nda eri\u015fim yasa\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131 olmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen YouTube IP\u2019lerine uygulanan yasa\u011f\u0131n Google\u2019a geni\u015fletilmesinin \u2018dolayl\u0131 sans\u00fcr\u2019 anlam\u0131na geldi\u011fi belirtildi.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130stanbul Bilgi \u00dcniversitesi Hukuk Fak\u00fcltesi \u00f6\u011fretim \u00fcyesi Do\u00e7. Dr. Yaman Akdeniz ve Ankara \u00dcniversitesi, Siyasal Bilgiler Fak\u00fcltesi \u00f6\u011fretim \u00fcyesi Yrd. Do\u00e7. Dr. Kerem Alt\u0131parmak \u2018kullan\u0131c\u0131 s\u0131fat\u0131\u2019 ile Bilgi Teknolojileri ve \u0130leti\u015fim Kurumu, Telekom\u00fcnikasyon \u0130leti\u015fim Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130nternet Daire Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na verdikleri dilek\u00e7eyle Google IP\u2019lerine eri\u015fim engeline itiraz etti. Dilek\u00e7ede http:\/\/www.youtube.com internet adresine ili\u015fkin IP adreslerinin g\u00fcncellemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n ivedilikle geri al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 talep edildi.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130tiraz dilek\u00e7esinde Akdeniz ve Alt\u0131parmak; Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n ge\u00e7ti\u011fimiz hafta i\u00e7inde http:\/\/www.youtube.com \u0130nternet adresine Ankara 1. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin karar\u0131 ile uygulanan eri\u015fim engellemesine ili\u015fkin IP adreslerinin g\u00fcncellenemesinden dolay\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan zarardan etkilenen milyonlarca kullan\u0131c\u0131dan ikisi olduklar\u0131n\u0131 Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011fa bildirdi.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130tiraz dilek\u00e7esinde YouTube ile ilgili IP adres g\u00fcncellemesi ve uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n Akdeniz ve Alt\u0131parmak dahil olmak \u00fczere Google servislerinin milyonlarca kullan\u0131c\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa ve uluslararas\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerle korunan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, bilgi edinme ve haberle\u015fme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc tamamen g\u00f6z ard\u0131 etti\u011fi savunuldu.<\/p>\n<p>Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n karar ve uygulamas\u0131ndan etkilenen Google siteleri ve servisleri hakk\u0131nda eri\u015fim engelleme karar\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131 \u00e7izilen dilek\u00e7ede, Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n dolayl\u0131 yoldan ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir \u015fekilde yayg\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131 olan siteleri sans\u00fcrlemekten ibaret oldu\u011fu ifade edildi.<\/p>\n<p>TEMEL HAKLAR SADECE YASAYLA SINIRLANIR<br \/>\n\u0130tiraz dilek\u00e7esinde Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n YouTube ile ilgili IP adres g\u00fcncellemesi ve uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddia edilirken, Anayasa\u2019ya g\u00f6re temel haklar ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin ancak kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rlanabilece\u011fi oysa uygulaman\u0131n hi\u00e7bir yasal dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc. Bu kapsamda Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkemeler taraf\u0131ndan verilmi\u015f olan eri\u015fim engelleme kararlar\u0131n\u0131 kararda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclenin \u00f6tesine ge\u00e7erek, keyfi bir \u015fekilde uygulama yetkisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edildi.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130tiraz dilek\u00e7esinde Ankara 1. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan verilmi\u015f olan 05.05.2008 tarih ve De\u011fi\u015fik \u0130\u015f 2008\/402 say\u0131l\u0131 YouTube web sitesine uygulanmakta olan koruma tedbir karar\u0131nda eri\u015fim engellemesinin \u2018http:\/\/www.youtube.com alan adl\u0131 Internet sitesine ve bu siteye eri\u015fimi sa\u011flayan 208.65.153.238-208.65.153.251 ve 208.65.153.253 numaral\u0131 IP adreslerine\u2019 yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011finin alt\u0131 \u00e7izildi.<\/p>\n<p>YOUTUBE SANS\u00dcR\u00dc DE TEMELS\u0130Z<br \/>\nAkdeniz ve Alt\u0131parmak, 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ve ilgili y\u00f6netmeliklerde Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011fa b\u00f6yle bir yetki verilmedi\u011fini hat\u0131rlatarak, Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n kararda bahsi ge\u00e7en IP adresleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki IP adreslerine eri\u015fim engelleme ve bu adresleri g\u00fcncelleme yetkisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fcler.<\/p>\n<p>Dilek\u00e7ede ayr\u0131ca Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k i\u015fleminin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddia edildi. \u0130tiraz dilek\u00e7esine g\u00f6re, Ankara 1. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan verilmi\u015f olan 05.05.2008 tarih ve De\u011fi\u015fik \u0130\u015f 2008\/402 say\u0131l\u0131 YouTube web sitesine uygulanmakta olan koruma tedbir karar\u0131n\u0131na s\u00f6z konusu olan 10 videodan alt\u0131 tanesi yay\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, di\u011fer d\u00f6rt videoya ili\u015fkin olarak da T\u00fcrkiye\u2019den YouTube\u2019a eri\u015filebilse dahi bu videolar\u0131n izlenemedi\u011fi tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Bu gerek\u00e7elere dayanarak Akdeniz ve Alt\u0131parmak karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Ankara 1. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019ne ve Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na ge\u00e7ti\u011fimiz hafta ba\u015f\u0131 yeni bir ba\u015fvuru yapt\u0131lar.<\/p>\n<p>Akdeniz ve Alt\u0131parmak\u2019a g\u00f6re, s\u00f6z konusu videolara T\u00fcrkiye\u2019den ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 imkans\u0131z hale geldi\u011finden ilgili siteyle ilgili daha kat\u0131 bir rejimin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 zorunlu k\u0131lacak hi\u00e7bir unsur yoktur. Tam tersine art\u0131k yasak kalksa bile ilgili videolara ula\u015fmak imkans\u0131zd\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130tiraza g\u00f6re, karar\u0131n uygulama \u015fekli ayn\u0131 zamanda orant\u0131s\u0131zd\u0131r. Bir sitedeki milyonlarca videodan ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 imkans\u0131z birka\u00e7 tanesi nedeniyle, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin en \u00e7ok kullan\u0131lan web siteleri haklar\u0131nda eri\u015fim engelleme karar\u0131 olmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen i\u015flevsiz hale getirilmektedir. Uygulama, Anayasa hukuku kitaplar\u0131nda orant\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131k bahsine \u00f6rnek yap\u0131lacak d\u00fczeyde \u00e7arp\u0131c\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Dilek\u00e7ede, uygulaman\u0131n ula\u015f\u0131lmak istenen ama\u00e7 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan elveri\u015fli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da iddia edilmi\u015ftir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc bu uygulama, videoyu koyan ki\u015fiyi de\u011fil konuyla ilgisi olmayan T\u00fcrkiye\u2019deki t\u00fcm \u0130nternet kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 cezaland\u0131rmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Akdeniz ve Alt\u0131parmak, Telekom\u00fcnikasyon \u0130leti\u015fim Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130nternet Daire Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n http:\/\/www.youtube.com \u0130nternet adresine ili\u015fkin IP adreslerinin g\u00fcncellemesi karar\u0131n\u0131 ivedilikle geri almas\u0131 ve bu uygulamas\u0131n\u0131 durdurmas\u0131 i\u00e7in dilek\u00e7elerini Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011fa teslim ettikten sonra 10 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde cevap alamazlarsa \u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019nde y\u00fcr\u00fctmeyi durudurma istemli iptal davas\u0131 a\u00e7acaklar\u0131n\u0131 bildirdiler.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Google karar\u0131na itiraz: Bu dolayl\u0131 sans\u00fcrd\u00fcr &#8211; \u0130nternet- ntvmsnbc.com: \u0130ki hukuk\u00e7u, YouTube eri\u015fim yasa\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerinden Google&#8217;a eri\u015fimi de zorla\u015ft\u0131rman\u0131n yasalara ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu iddia ederek itirazda bulundu. \u0130li\u015fkili foto\u011fraflar\u0131 g\u00f6ster ntvmsnbc, G\u00fcncelleme: 11:57 TS\u0130 08 Haziran. 2010 Sal\u0131 Pek \u00e7ok Google servislerine T\u00fcrkiye\u2019den ula\u015f\u0131m\u0131 zorla\u015ft\u0131ran IP engelleme karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 itirazda bulunuldu. \u0130ki hukuk\u00e7unun Bilgi Teknolojileri ve \u0130leti\u015fim Kurumu\u2019na verdikleri dilek\u00e7ede, Google&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[22,5,21,8,102,142,3,17,67,78,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1021","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-5651-nolu-kanun","category-dusunce-ozgurlugu","category-erisim-engelleme","category-google","category-idari-tedbir","category-kerem-altiparmak","category-sansur","category-tib","category-turkiye","category-yaman-akdeniz","category-youtube"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7wjA8-gt","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1021","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1021"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1021\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1022,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1021\/revisions\/1022"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1021"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1021"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1021"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}