{"id":1113,"date":"2010-06-27T11:41:19","date_gmt":"2010-06-27T08:41:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=1113"},"modified":"2010-06-27T11:41:22","modified_gmt":"2010-06-27T08:41:22","slug":"sabah-youtube-yasagina-dava","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=1113","title":{"rendered":"Sabah – Youtube yasa\u011f\u0131na dava"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sabah – Youtube yasa\u011f\u0131na dava<\/a><\/p>\n

* AA
\n * Giri\u015f Saati : 25.06.2010 14:29
\n G\u00fcncelleme : 25.06.2010 14:32<\/p>\n

\u0130nternet Teknolojileri Derne\u011fi (INETD), Youtube internet sitesinin eri\u015fiminin engellenmesinin temel hukuk kurullar\u0131na, Anayasaya ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesine ve direktiflerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla y\u00fcr\u00fctmenin iptali istemiyle dava a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n

INETD Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Do\u00e7. Dr. Mustafa Akg\u00fcl, mahkemenin 05.05.2008 tarihli ve 17.06.2010 ek karar\u0131 ile Youtube.com sitesine tedbiren eri\u015fimin engellendi\u011fini an\u0131msatt\u0131.<\/p>\n

Derne\u011fin ge\u00e7en y\u0131l Youtube yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi’ne (A\u0130HM) ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 dile getiren Akg\u00fcl, \u015f\u00f6yle konu\u015ftu:<\/p>\n

”S\u00f6z konusu mahkeme kararlar\u0131, bir kitap y\u00fcz\u00fcnden milyonlarca kitab\u0131 i\u00e7eren bir k\u00fct\u00fcphanenin kap\u0131s\u0131na kilit vurmak anlam\u0131na geliyor. T\u00fcrkiye’den eri\u015filemeyen i\u00e7eri\u011fin t\u00fcm d\u00fcnyadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istemek, mahkemenin uluslararas\u0131 hukuku tesis etmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bu bir yetki a\u015f\u0131m\u0131d\u0131r. Youtube’un kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 T\u00fcrk ve d\u00fcnya kamuoyunda matbaan\u0131n yasaklanmas\u0131na benzer bir alg\u0131lamaya sebep olmaktad\u0131r. A\u0130HM’de davam\u0131za bu nedenle \u00f6ncelik verilmi\u015ftir.”<\/p>\n

Akg\u00fcl, yasa\u011fa ili\u015fkin mahkeme kararlar\u0131n\u0131n birka\u00e7 T\u00fcrkiye d\u00fc\u015fman\u0131n\u0131n koydu\u011fu ve T\u00fcrkiye’de eri\u015fimi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmayan birka\u00e7 video y\u00fcz\u00fcnden yarg\u0131s\u0131z infaz g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcs\u00fc verdi\u011fini belirterek, bu yasa\u011f\u0131n kald\u0131rarak internetin \u00f6zg\u00fcrle\u015ftirilmesi ve bu yolla T\u00fcrk toplumunu geli\u015fmesine katk\u0131da bulunmas\u0131n\u0131 hukuk ve adalet sisteminden beklediklerini ifade etti.<\/p>\n

-”T\u00dcRK\u0130YE’N\u0130N ULUSLARARASI SAYGINLI\u011eI…”<\/p>\n

D\u00fcn, Ankara 1. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi’ne sunulan dava dilek\u00e7esinde ise karardan zarar g\u00f6ren, ileti\u015fim ve d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce a\u00e7\u0131klama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc k\u0131s\u0131tlanan m\u00fcvekkil dernek \u00fcyelerinin bulundu\u011funa i\u015faret edildi.
\nINETD’in yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 etkinliklere ait videolar\u0131 Youtube \u00fczerinden de da\u011f\u0131tt\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilen dilek\u00e7ede, ayr\u0131ca karar\u0131n derne\u011fin amac\u0131 olan internetin yayg\u0131nla\u015fmas\u0131na engel te\u015fkil etti\u011fi ifade edildi.<\/p>\n

Dilek\u00e7ede, \u015funlar kaydedildi:<\/p>\n

”Uygulanan tedbir karar\u0131n\u0131n, karara temelini olu\u015fturan zararl\u0131 bulunan 10 videoya eri\u015fimi k\u0131s\u0131tlama konusunda hi\u00e7bir etkisinin olmamas\u0131, buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k hem T\u00fcrkiye’nin uluslararas\u0131 sayg\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131, hem yurtta\u015flar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n kendilerini geli\u015ftirmelerine, tan\u0131t\u0131m ve e\u011fitim yapmalar\u0131na k\u0131s\u0131tlama getirmesi; tedbir karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00fclkemize zarar vermesine sebep olmaktad\u0131r.”<\/p>\n

S\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131n temel hukuk kurallar\u0131na, Anayasaya, Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesine ve direktiflerine, ceza yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fc ve esaslar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funun iddia edildi\u011fi dilek\u00e7ede, ayr\u0131ca internet vas\u0131tas\u0131 ile ilgili su\u00e7lar\u0131n bili\u015fim su\u00e7u kapsam\u0131nda oldu\u011fu ve bas\u0131n savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ilgilendirmedi\u011fi de ifade edildi.<\/p>\n

-”YASAKLI DI\u015eINDAK\u0130 V\u0130DEOLARA ENGEL”-<\/p>\n

Youtube sitesine eri\u015fimin engellenmesini i\u00e7eren mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n yasaklananlar\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki videolara eri\u015fimi engelleme sonucu getirdi\u011fi belirtilen dilek\u00e7ede, \u015f\u00f6yle denildi:<\/p>\n

”\u0130nternetin yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n, biraz becerikli birinin, interneti toptan kapatmak d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda al\u0131nan b\u00fct\u00fcn tedbirleri a\u015farak arzulanan i\u00e7eri\u011fe eri\u015febilmesi imkan\u0131 sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 hat\u0131rlatmak isteriz.
\n\u00d6te yandan Youtube’ta Atat\u00fcrk ile ilgili 60 bin \u00fczerinde video vard\u0131r. Bir avu\u00e7 video y\u00fcz\u00fcnden 60 bin Atat\u00fcrk’\u00fc savunan, ona sahip \u00e7\u0131kan videoyu yasaklamak ne kadar yararl\u0131 olacakt\u0131r? Bir avu\u00e7 videoya eri\u015fim, tam adresini bilmeyen biri i\u00e7in mucizeye kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Eri\u015fim yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 2 y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015fk\u0131n bir s\u00fcredir s\u00fcrmesi, Youtube’u kullanmak isteyen t\u00fcm yurtta\u015flar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n ileti\u015fim, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, i\u015f yapma, tan\u0131t\u0131m, \u00f6\u011frenme, e\u011flenme ve \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme haklar\u0131na s\u0131n\u0131rlama getirmektedir.”<\/p>\n

Dilek\u00e7ede, koruma amac\u0131yla al\u0131nan, ge\u00e7ici olmas\u0131 gereken tedbir karar\u0131n\u0131n, yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmadan kesinle\u015fmi\u015f gibi uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 da belirtilerek, ”\u015eayet bir su\u00e7lu varsa, bu o videolar\u0131 koyanlard\u0131r. Youtube yetkililerine dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 bir yere kadar anla\u015f\u0131labilinir. Ama, eri\u015fimi engelleme karar\u0131 bu ikisine dava a\u00e7madan, T\u00fcrk vatanda\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ile sonu\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Biz TC vatanda\u015flar\u0131 olarak su\u00e7umuz olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131yoruz. Bizim adil yarg\u0131lama hakk\u0131m\u0131z da k\u0131s\u0131tlanmaktad\u0131r” ifadelerine yer verildi.<\/p>\n

-”YASAK KOLAYCA DEL\u0130N\u0130YOR”-<\/p>\n

Dilek\u00e7ede, Youtube yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kolayca delindi\u011finin herkes\u00e7e bilindi\u011fi de vurgulanarak, \u015funlar kaydedildi:
\n”Ba\u015fbakan’\u0131n ‘Ben Youtube’a giriyorum, siz de girin’ s\u00f6z\u00fc bas\u0131n ve TV’de yer ald\u0131. Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131, Ba\u015fm\u00fczakereci ve Devlet Bakan\u0131 Egemen Ba\u011f\u0131\u015f ve hatta Ula\u015ft\u0131rma Bakan\u0131 ve BTK Ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n yasa\u011f\u0131 ele\u015ftiren deme\u00e7leri var. Bas\u0131n ve TV’de yasa\u011f\u0131n nas\u0131l delinece\u011fi haber b\u00fcltenlerinde ve ba\u015fyazarlar\u0131n k\u00f6\u015fe yaz\u0131lar\u0131nda anlat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

\u00d6te yandan, bu yasak, \u00fclkemizi AB, AG\u0130T, ve benzeri ortamlarda ele\u015ftirilmesine neden olmakta, \u00fclke imaj\u0131na ciddi zararlar vermektedir. Bunun ekonomik de\u011feri milyarlar\u0131 bulmaktad\u0131r. Yasa\u011f\u0131n, verilen 10 video a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan, pratik hi\u00e7 bir art\u0131s\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bir kere daha hat\u0131rlatt\u0131ktan sonra, orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan b\u00f6yle karar\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesi, Yarg\u0131tay ve A\u0130HM kararlar\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda hi\u00e7 verilmemesi gerekti\u011fini hat\u0131rlatmak isteriz.”<\/p>\n

Dilek\u00e7ede, e\u011fer yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir i\u00e7erik varsa yaln\u0131zca o i\u00e7eri\u011fin engellenmesinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131n olmas\u0131 gereken yasal uygulama oldu\u011fu da savunularak, ”Devlet URL filtrelemesi denilen sadece belirlenen nesnelere eri\u015fimi engelleyen yap\u0131y\u0131 kurabilir. BTK bunu yapacak idari, mali ve teknik beceriye sahiptir” ifadeleri de yer ald\u0131.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sabah – Youtube yasa\u011f\u0131na dava * AA * Giri\u015f Saati : 25.06.2010 14:29 G\u00fcncelleme : 25.06.2010 14:32 \u0130nternet Teknolojileri Derne\u011fi (INETD), Youtube internet sitesinin eri\u015fiminin engellenmesinin temel hukuk kurullar\u0131na, Anayasaya ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesine ve direktiflerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla y\u00fcr\u00fctmenin iptali istemiyle dava a\u00e7t\u0131. INETD Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Do\u00e7. Dr. Mustafa Akg\u00fcl, mahkemenin 05.05.2008 tarihli ve 17.06.2010 ek karar\u0131 ile Youtube.com…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[22,5,21,8,3,67,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1113","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-5651-nolu-kanun","category-dusunce-ozgurlugu","category-erisim-engelleme","category-google","category-sansur","category-turkiye","category-youtube"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7wjA8-hX","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1113","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1113"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1113\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1114,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1113\/revisions\/1114"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1113"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1113"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1113"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}