{"id":1207,"date":"2010-10-11T15:20:59","date_gmt":"2010-10-11T12:20:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=1207"},"modified":"2010-10-11T15:21:01","modified_gmt":"2010-10-11T12:21:01","slug":"kursat-bumin-internet-yasaklari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=1207","title":{"rendered":"K\u00fcr\u015fat Bumin: \u0130nternet yasaklar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u0130nternet yasaklar\u0131 – K\u00fcr\u015fat Bumin – Makale – k\u00f6\u015fe yaz\u0131s\u0131 11 Ekim 2010 Pazartesi 08:23<\/a><\/p>\n

K\u00fcr\u015fat Bumin<\/p>\n

\u0130ki \u00f6\u011fretim \u00fcyesi (Do\u00e7.Dr.Yaman Akdeniz ve Yrd.Do\u00e7.Dr. Kerem Alt\u0131parmak) \u00fcnl\u00fc Playboy dergisinin internet sitesine getirilen yasa\u011f\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f. \u00d6\u011fretim \u00fcyeleri davay\u0131 ‘kullan\u0131c\u0131 s\u0131fat\u0131’ ile a\u00e7m\u0131\u015flar. Bu ‘s\u0131fat’\u0131n bu \u00f6\u011fretim \u00fcyelerinin daha \u00f6nce youtube ve lastfm’e kar\u015f\u0131 uygulanan eri\u015fim yasa\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Ankara \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nde a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 davalar\u0131n ‘konuya taraf olmad\u0131klar\u0131’ gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmesinden dolay\u0131 se\u00e7ilip se\u00e7ilmedi\u011fini bilmiyorum. S\u00f6z konusu gerek\u00e7e ‘kullan\u0131c\u0131 s\u0131fat\u0131’n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131na da dikilebilir mi, do\u011frusu onu da bilmiyorum. Ama bence (de) dikilmemeli; \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc ‘konuya taraf olabilmek’, yani davaya ‘m\u00fcdahil’ olabilmek i\u00e7in ‘kullan\u0131c\u0131 s\u0131fat\u0131’ fazlas\u0131yla yeterlidir.
\nYeri gelmi\u015fken i\u00e7 hukukumuzun \u015fu ‘m\u00fcdahil’lik meselesinde bir t\u00fcrl\u00fc yoluna koyamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir eksikli\u011fi de hat\u0131rlatay\u0131m. Biliyorsunuz, bizde ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k gibi ‘nefret su\u00e7lar\u0131’ s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011funda bireylerin ve giderek toplumun bir kesiminin bu t\u00fcr su\u00e7lara ili\u015fkin olarak ‘davac\u0131-m\u00fcdahil’ olabilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. B\u00f6yle durumlarda davac\u0131 olmak isteyenlere ‘Bu olayda siz taraf m\u0131s\u0131n\u0131z?’ sorusu y\u00f6neltilir. Bu soruyu ‘Konu bizi ki\u015fisel olarak do\u011frudan ilgilendirmiyor ama falanca gazetenin \u015fu \u0131rk\u00e7\u0131 man\u015feti atabilmesi ‘Ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131kla m\u00fccadele derne\u011fi’ olarak bizi tabii ki ilgilendiriyor’ \u015feklinde cevaplarsan\u0131z, alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131z cevap ‘\u0130\u00e7 hukukumuz buna imkan tan\u0131m\u0131yor’ \u015feklinde olacakt\u0131r. Bundan sonras\u0131 savc\u0131n\u0131n ‘kamu davas\u0131’ a\u00e7\u0131p a\u00e7mayaca\u011f\u0131na kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r… Sadece ‘ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k’ konusu de\u011fil, ‘kad\u0131n haklar\u0131’, ‘\u00e7ocuk haklar\u0131’, ‘hayvan haklar\u0131’, ‘sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 \u00e7evre haklar\u0131’ gibi benzer bir\u00e7ok konuda da toplumun bu alanlarda olu\u015fturdu\u011fu \u00f6rg\u00fctlerin \u2013’konuya do\u011frudan taraf olmad\u0131klar\u0131’ i\u00e7in- hukuk m\u00fccadelesi verme haklar\u0131 yoktur. ‘T\u00fcketici haklar\u0131’ s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011funda da ayn\u0131 ‘duvar’ dikilir kar\u015f\u0131n\u0131za. T\u00fcketici dernekleri bir bi\u00e7imde haberdar olduklar\u0131 sa\u011fl\u0131ks\u0131z \u00fcr\u00fcn \u00fcreten bir ‘marka’ hakk\u0131nda \u015fikayet\u00e7i olamazlar. Bu t\u00fcr davalar ancak, s\u00f6z konusu sa\u011fl\u0131ks\u0131z \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc t\u00fcketip ‘ki\u015fisel zarar’ g\u00f6renler taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131labilir. Bir yerle\u015fim yerinde \u00e7evreyi kirleten bir sanayi kurulu\u015fu hakk\u0131nda davac\u0131 olabilmek i\u00e7in de benzer \u015fekilde ‘do\u011frudan zarar g\u00f6rmek’ gerekir.
\nBu t\u00fcr bir hukuksal yap\u0131da ve i\u015fleyi\u015fte ‘hukuk’un ‘toplum’dan hareketle olu\u015fturulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 muhakkakt\u0131r.. Bunun teorik izah\u0131, ‘Hukuk’un, dahil oldu\u011fumuz siyaset felsefesi dairesinin bir icab\u0131 olarak bizde de ‘toplum’u devreye sokmadan do\u011frudan ‘Devlet’ten ne\u015fet etmesi gerekti\u011fine ili\u015fkin yerle\u015fik kabuld\u00fcr.
\nD\u00f6nelim ‘Playboy’un internet sitesine getirilen yasa\u011fa ve bu yasa\u011f\u0131n kalkmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuruya.
\n‘Playboy’ dergisi, bilindi\u011fi (ve s\u00f6ylendi\u011fi ) gibi bir ‘erkek dergisi’. \u00c7ok eskiden beri (belki de y\u00fcz ya\u015f\u0131nda!) yay\u0131mlanmakta olan bir dergi. ‘Eski Rejim’ d\u00f6neminde T\u00fcrkiye’ye giri\u015fi yasak olan dergilerdendi. Sonra 12 Eyl\u00fcl geldi, sonra \u00d6zal geldi, sonra ‘\u00f6zel hayat’\u0131n \u00f6nemli-de\u011ferli oldu\u011fu kanaati geldi, sonda cinselli\u011fin ‘ke\u015ffi’ geldi ve bu dalga ile birlikte ‘Playboy’un da T\u00fcrk\u00e7e versiyonu \u00fclkeye girmi\u015f oldu. \u0130yi hat\u0131rl\u0131yorum: Playboy’un T\u00fcrk\u00e7e yay\u0131mlanmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bu yay\u0131n giri\u015fimi dergiyi \u00e7\u0131karanlar\u0131n \u00e7o\u011fu taraf\u0131ndan bir ‘devrim’ olarak sunulmu\u015ftu! Oysa biliyorsunuzdur \u2013bilmeyenler, internet sitesi da kapal\u0131 oldu\u011funa g\u00f6re art\u0131k bilemeyecekler!- bu ‘erkek dergisi’ satt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ‘cinsellik’ a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan b\u0131rak\u0131n ‘devrim’i, tam tersine ‘kar\u015f\u0131-devrim’i \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131\u015ft\u0131ran bir yay\u0131ndan ibaretti.
\n\u00d6\u011fretim \u00fcyeleri \u2013hakl\u0131 olarak- soruyorlar: D\u00fcnyan\u0131n d\u00f6rt bir yan\u0131nda (belki \u00c7in’de de!) bu derginin internet sitesine eri\u015fim serbestken T\u0130B bu yasa\u011f\u0131 ni\u00e7in koydu? Ve hemen arkas\u0131ndan da bu yasak ile ‘Anayasa’da yer alan temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerden \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fi, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce, ifade, bilgi edinme ve haberle\u015fme hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131’ s\u00f6yl\u00fcyorlar.
\nT\u0130B taraf\u0131ndan eri\u015fimi engellenen dergiye ait internet sitesi hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f veya sonu\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015f bir ceza davas\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sitenin hangi i\u00e7eri\u011finin su\u00e7 olu\u015fturdu\u011funa ili\u015fkin tek bir a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n yaplmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten davac\u0131lar, ‘Devlet ajanlar\u0131n\u0131n ahlaki de\u011ferlerinin \u00f6zel hayat\u0131 hi\u00e7e sayarak bireylere dayat\u0131lmas\u0131 hukuk d\u00fczeninin \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck\u00e7\u00fc bir d\u00fczen olmaktan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131p, otoriter bir d\u00fczene \u00e7evirir’ diyorlar. \u00d6\u011fretim \u00fcyelerine g\u00f6re, T\u0130B’in bu yasa\u011f\u0131 uygulamas\u0131na temel te\u015fkil eden 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 yasan\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131nda \u00e7ocuklar ve yeti\u015fkinler aras\u0131nda bir ayr\u0131m g\u00f6zetilmemektedir.
\n‘\u0130nternet yasaklar\u0131’ndan s\u00f6z etti\u011fimize g\u00f6re, yaz\u0131y\u0131 bitirmeden \u00dcmit K\u0131van\u00e7’\u0131n birka\u00e7 g\u00fcn \u00f6nce (02.10.2010) yay\u0131mlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Taraf) yaz\u0131s\u0131nda duyurdu\u011fu bir yasa\u011f\u0131, Vimeo.com adl\u0131 video payla\u015f\u0131m sitesine getirilen eri\u015fim yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da hat\u0131rlatay\u0131m. K\u0131van\u00e7’\u0131n s\u00f6zleriyle, ‘eser’ s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 hak edecek y\u00fcz binlerce videonun yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu siteye getirilen yasak da anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r gibi de\u011fil.
\n‘Eserlerini ba\u015fka mecralarda sunma \u015fans\u0131na sahip olamayan ya da internet \u00e2leminde ayr\u0131ca tan\u0131tmak isteyen ya da \u00f6zellikle internet i\u00e7in eser \u00fcreten on binlerce insan vimeo’ya filmlerini koyuyor.(…) B\u00fcy\u00fck ihtimalle, d\u00fcnyan\u0131n d\u00f6rt bir taraf\u0131ndan onbinlerce ki\u015finin ortaya koydu\u011fu videolardan birinde, hayat\u0131m\u0131z\u0131 karartmak ve ruhumu kurutmaktan ba\u015fka bir \u015fey yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 hi\u00e7 ama hi\u00e7 g\u00f6rmedi\u011fim, ya\u015famad\u0131\u011f\u0131m devlet g\u00f6revlilerimizin sinirine dokunan bir \u015feyler vard\u0131r. Cart, yasaklam\u0131\u015flar. Aferin.’<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u0130nternet yasaklar\u0131 – K\u00fcr\u015fat Bumin – Makale – k\u00f6\u015fe yaz\u0131s\u0131 11 Ekim 2010 Pazartesi 08:23 K\u00fcr\u015fat Bumin \u0130ki \u00f6\u011fretim \u00fcyesi (Do\u00e7.Dr.Yaman Akdeniz ve Yrd.Do\u00e7.Dr. Kerem Alt\u0131parmak) \u00fcnl\u00fc Playboy dergisinin internet sitesine getirilen yasa\u011f\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f. \u00d6\u011fretim \u00fcyeleri davay\u0131 ‘kullan\u0131c\u0131 s\u0131fat\u0131’ ile a\u00e7m\u0131\u015flar. Bu ‘s\u0131fat’\u0131n bu \u00f6\u011fretim \u00fcyelerinin daha \u00f6nce youtube ve lastfm’e kar\u015f\u0131 uygulanan eri\u015fim yasa\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Ankara…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[22,5,21,159,3,17,67,78],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1207","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-5651-nolu-kanun","category-dusunce-ozgurlugu","category-erisim-engelleme","category-playboy","category-sansur","category-tib","category-turkiye","category-yaman-akdeniz"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7wjA8-jt","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1207","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1207"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1207\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1208,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1207\/revisions\/1208"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1207"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1207"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1207"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}