{"id":1394,"date":"2011-04-26T11:25:15","date_gmt":"2011-04-26T08:25:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=1394"},"modified":"2011-04-26T11:27:38","modified_gmt":"2011-04-26T08:27:38","slug":"erikelin-cevabi-chpnin-sitesinde","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=1394","title":{"rendered":"ER\u0130KEL`\u0130N CEVABI CHP`N\u0130N S\u0130TES\u0130NDE"},"content":{"rendered":"

ER\u0130KEL`\u0130N CEVABI CHP`N\u0130N S\u0130TES\u0130NDE<\/a><\/p>\n

24.04.2011<\/p>\n

ANKARA – Mahkeme, CHP`nin internet sitesinde yay\u0131nlanan, avukat Yakup Erikel ile ilgili yaz\u0131n\u0131n yay\u0131ndan kald\u0131r\u0131larak, Erikel`in cevab\u0131n\u0131n, s\u00f6z konusu internet sitesinde bir hafta s\u00fcre ile yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131na karar verdi. Mahkemenin, 24 Aral\u0131k 2010 tarih\t<\/p>\n

ANKARA- Mahkeme, CHP`nin internet sitesinde yay\u0131nlanan, avukat Yakup Erikel ile ilgili yaz\u0131n\u0131n yay\u0131ndan kald\u0131r\u0131larak, Erikel`in cevab\u0131n\u0131n, s\u00f6z konusu internet sitesinde bir hafta s\u00fcre ile yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131na karar verdi.<\/p>\n

Mahkemenin, 24 Aral\u0131k 2010 tarihinde verdi\u011fi kararda, avukat Yakup Erikel`in, 22 Aral\u0131k 2010`da mahkemeye yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvuruda, kendisi hakk\u0131nda, “www.chp.org.tr“ adresli i\u00e7erik sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan “ger\u00e7ek d\u0131\u015f\u0131 yay\u0131na“ ili\u015fkin olarak i\u00e7eri\u011fin yay\u0131ndan kald\u0131r\u0131larak, cevap ve d\u00fczeltme metninin yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep etti\u011fi an\u0131msat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

Kararda, CHP`nin internet sitesinde yay\u0131nlanan yaz\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finde aktar\u0131lan haberin, Erikel`in ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal edici nitelikte oldu\u011fu, bu \u015fekildeki yay\u0131n\u0131n cevap ve d\u00fczeltme hakk\u0131 do\u011furacak nitelikte bulundu\u011fu kanaatine var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kaydedildi.<\/p>\n

Ankara 11. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesinin karar\u0131nda, s\u00f6z konusu nedenlerle 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa`n\u0131n 9\/2. maddesi gere\u011fince “www.chp.org.tr“ internet adresinde, Yakup Erikel hakk\u0131ndaki yaz\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011finin yay\u0131ndan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve cevap metninin bir hafta s\u00fcreyle internet ortam\u0131nda yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi ifade edildi.<\/p>\n

CHP’nin iddias\u0131na mahkemeden tekzip
\n27 Aral\u0131k 2010 Pazartesi, 22:01 <\/p>\n

K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu’nun TBMM’de avukat Yakup Erikel’e y\u00f6nelik iddialar\u0131 mahkemece tekzip edildi. Erikel, iddialar\u0131n ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik karar ald\u0131rtt\u0131 ve bu karar\u0131n CHP’nin sitesinde yay\u0131mlanmas\u0131n\u0131 h\u00fckme ba\u011flatt\u0131.
\n CHP Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu’nun TBMM k\u00fcrs\u00fcs\u00fcnden avukat Yakup Erikel’e y\u00f6nelik s\u00f6yledi\u011fi ‘dosyay\u0131 vekaletsiz ve sahte evrakla takip etti\u011fi’ iddias\u0131 mahkemece tekzip edildi.<\/p>\n

Ankara 11. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi’ne ba\u015fvuran avukat Erikel, ortaya at\u0131lan iddialar\u0131n ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik karar ald\u0131rtt\u0131 ve bu karar\u0131n CHP’nin internet sitesinde yay\u0131mlanmas\u0131n\u0131 h\u00fckme ba\u011flatt\u0131.<\/p>\n

Dava dilek\u00e7esinde Erikel, kendisi hakk\u0131nda ‘www.chp.org.tr’ adresli i\u00e7erik sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131ndan yay\u0131nlanan ger\u00e7ek d\u0131\u015f\u0131 yay\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak i\u00e7eri\u011fin yay\u0131ndan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve cevap ile d\u00fczeltme metninin yay\u0131mlanmas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep etti.<\/p>\n

Mahkeme, ‘CHP t\u00fczel ki\u015fili\u011fine ait ‘www.chp.org.tr’ isimli i\u00e7erik sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131nda yay\u0131nlanan ‘Avukat Yakup Erikel, Hac\u0131 Ali Hamurcu isimli \u015fahs\u0131n avukat\u0131d\u0131r. Avukat\u0131 ise vekaleti nerededir. Dosyada bulunan vekaletin noter kayd\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re, dosyada sahte vekalet kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Adalet Bakan\u0131 neden hala bu olayla ilgili olarak soru\u015fturma a\u00e7t\u0131rmamaktad\u0131r.’ ile ‘Avukat Yakup Erikel Hac\u0131 Ali Hamurcu isimli \u015fahs\u0131n avukat\u0131 ise ve bu \u015fahs\u0131n Kayseri B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 ile bu dosyada has\u0131m olduklar\u0131 kesin iken, avukat Yakup Erikel’in bu dava ile ilgili olarak Kayseri’de bulundu\u011fu g\u00fcnlerde konaklad\u0131\u011f\u0131 otel faturalar\u0131n\u0131 neden kar\u015f\u0131 taraf olan Kayseri B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6demi\u015ftir.’ yaz\u0131lar\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finin talepte bulunan\u0131n ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal edici nitelikte oldu\u011fu, bu \u015fekildeki yay\u0131n\u0131n cevap ve d\u00fczeltme hakk\u0131 do\u011furacak nitelikte bulundu\u011fu kanaatine vararak, talebin kabul\u00fcne karar verdi.<\/p>\n

Mahkemenin h\u00fck\u00fcm b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde de internet sitesinde yay\u0131nlanan yaz\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finin yay\u0131ndan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve cevap metninin bir hafta s\u00fcreyle internet sitesinde yay\u0131mlanmas\u0131 kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

TEKZ\u0130P B\u0130R HAFTA CHP’N\u0130N S\u0130TES\u0130NDE<\/p>\n

24 Aral\u0131k’taki karar\u0131 de\u011ferlendiren avukat Yakup Erikel, CHP Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu’nun Meclis k\u00fcrs\u00fcs\u00fcnden hakk\u0131nda sahtecilik ve vekaletsiz bir \u015fekilde dosyay\u0131 takip etti\u011fini iddia etti\u011fini hat\u0131rlatt\u0131. Kendisinin bu bilgilerin do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle mahkemeye ba\u015fvurdu\u011funu anlatan Erikel, bunlar\u0131n hepsinin yanl\u0131\u015f ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir karar verildi\u011fini vurgulad\u0131.<\/p>\n

Tekzip karar\u0131n\u0131n bir hafta s\u00fcreyle CHP’nin internet sitesinde yay\u0131nlanaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 dile getiren Erikel, K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu ile CHP Kayseri milletvekilinin iddialar\u0131n\u0131n yalan oldu\u011funun ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n

ANKARA N\u00d6BET\u00c7\u0130 SULH CEZA MAHKEMES\u0130 HAK\u0130ML\u0130\u011e\u0130NE<\/p>\n

TALEPTE BULUNAN: Avukat Yakup ER\u0130KEL<\/p>\n

MUHATAP: CHP internet sitesi < vvww.chp.org.tr > sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 ve CHP t\u00fczel ki\u015fili\u011fi<\/p>\n

KONU: Muhatab\u0131n internet sitesinde yay\u0131nlanan \u015fahs\u0131mla ilgili ger\u00e7ek d\u0131\u015f\u0131 haberin yay\u0131ndan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep ve do\u011fru haberi i\u00e7eren tekzip metninin bir hafta s\u00fcre ile yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131n\u0131n talebidir.<\/p>\n

A\u00c7IKLAMALAR:<\/p>\n

1- Son g\u00fcnlerde KAYSER\u0130 ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 belediyeye dair \u00e7e\u015fitli siyasi tart\u0131\u015fmalarla ilgili ismim avukat s\u0131fat\u0131yla olaya kar\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f ve ismim \u00fczerinde \u00e7e\u015fitli tart\u0131\u015fmalar a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

2- \u00d6ncelikle belirtmem gerekir ki benim siyasi tart\u0131\u015fmalarla ve siyasi tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n taraflar\u0131 ile bu olaya dair hi\u00e7bir ba\u011flant\u0131m yoktur.<\/p>\n

3- Ben olayda ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en Hac\u0131 Ali Hamurcu’nun vekili olarak g\u00f6rev ald\u0131m. Muhatab\u0131mda m\u00fcvekkilim Hac\u0131 Ali Hamurcu’dur.<\/p>\n

4- Dolay\u0131s\u0131 ile buna dair bilgileri mahkemenize sunarak 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 yasan\u0131n 9. Maddesi gere\u011fi haklar\u0131m\u0131 kutlanmak istiyorum.<\/p>\n

5- Ancak bunlar\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u015fahs\u0131ma mesle\u011fime dair her t\u00fcrl\u00fc olay ve beyanlar\u0131 takip ediyor bunlarla ilgili su\u00e7 duyurusu, maddi ve manevi tazminat haklar\u0131m\u0131 sakl\u0131 tutuyorum.<\/p>\n

6- Hac\u0131 Ali Hamurcu karde\u015fim Avukat Yusuf ER\u0130KEL’ Ankara Yenimahalle 3. Noterli\u011fi 04.07.2007 tarih ve 27091 yevmiye no ile vek\u00e2letname vermi\u015ftir, ( EK-1 )<\/p>\n

7- Karde\u015fim Avukat Yusuf Erikel m\u00fcvekkil Hac\u0131 Ali Hamurcu ile m\u00fcvekkil g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme tutana\u011f\u0131 ve vek\u00e2let anla\u015fmas\u0131 imzalam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. ( EK – 2 )<\/p>\n

8- Daha sonra Avukat Yusuf Erikel Yenimahalle 3 Noterli\u011fince kendisine verileri vek\u00e2letnameye istinaden taraf\u0131ma Avukat Yakup ER\u0130KEL olarak tevkii \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. ( EK – 3 )<\/p>\n

9- Ben bu tevkil ile m\u00fcvekkil Hac\u0131 Ali Hamurcu’nun Kayseri 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 2007 ( 253 Esas ve 2008 \/ 3 Karar nolu dosyas\u0131n\u0131 yerel mahkemede ve Yarg\u0131tay a\u015famas\u0131nda avukat s\u0131fat\u0131yla hakim huzurunda takip ederek sonu\u00e7land\u0131rd\u0131m. ( EK-4 )<\/p>\n

10- Yani Hac\u0131 Ali Hamurcu’nun t\u00fcm yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda yere! ve Yarg\u0131tay a\u015famas\u0131nda vekil olarak g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131m. Gerek mahkeme karar\u0131 gerek Yarg\u0131tay ilam\u0131 vekil olarak taraf\u0131ma tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

11- Ayr\u0131ca Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 9.12,1974 tarih ve 272 es. 447.karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda da belirtildi\u011fi gibi avukat san\u0131kla birlikte duru\u015fmaya gelerek h\u00e2kim huzurunda onu m\u00fcdafi olarak kabul etti\u011fini bildirdi\u011fi anda kazan\u0131lacak, ba\u015fkaca bir usul ve merasime gerek olmayacakt\u0131r. Zaten gerek CMUK 136 ve devam\u0131nda gerekse de, CMK 149 ve devam\u0131nda m\u00fcdafilik i\u00e7in her hangi bir usul veya merasim \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fka bir ifadeyle her hangi bir kurum veya organdan belge d\u00fczenlettirmesine gerek bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, gerek CMUK gerekse CMK da m\u00fcdafi s\u0131fat\u0131na haiz olmak i\u00e7in noterden vek\u00e2letname \u00e7\u0131kartman\u0131n \u015fart oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin bir en k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

12- Bu fiili durum ve Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun i\u00e7tihad\u0131 gere\u011fi benim Hac\u0131 Ali Hamurcu vekili olarak yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda bulunmam savunma vekili, m\u00fcdafii ve avukat olarakt\u0131r. BU DURUM HUKUK\u0130 BAKIMDAN TARTI\u015eMA G\u00d6T\u00dcRMEYECEK B\u0130R GER\u00c7EKT\u0130R.<\/p>\n

13- Dolay\u0131s\u0131 ile sahte vek\u00e2let kullanmam gibi hi\u00e7bir durum s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fildir. Ayr\u0131ca yetki belgesi de taraf\u0131n\u0131zca bilindi\u011fi gibi tevkili alan vekil taraf\u0131ndan de\u011fil tevkili veren vekil taraf\u0131ndan doldurulur. Karde\u015fim Avukat Yusuf Erikel bu tart\u0131\u015fmalar \u00fczerine kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 Silivri Cezaevi’nden taraf\u0131ma faks \u00e7ekerek vekaleti ayr\u0131ca da teyit etmi\u015ftir. { EK – 5 )<\/p>\n

14- Bu tart\u0131\u015fmalarda \u00f6\u011frendik ki tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lan konu taraf\u0131ma Avukat Yusuf Erikel taraf\u0131ndan verilen tevkil belgesinde noter yevmiye nosunun 3 rakam\u0131 sehven yanl\u0131\u015f yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f. Bu yanl\u0131\u015f yaz\u0131lman\u0131n hi\u00e7bir hukuki de\u011feri olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi ayr\u0131ca da her a\u015famada d\u00fczeltilebilir. Hi\u00e7bir hukuki de\u011feri olmamakla birlikte basit bir inceleme ile bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda yevmiye nosundaki \u00e7izgili rakamlar do\u011fru yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f yani 27091 nolu say\u0131n\u0131n tevkil belgesinde 7 ve 1 rakam\u0131 do\u011fru yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, yuvarlak rakamlar ise d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncem odur ki faks veya fotokopiden okunamayarak yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k olu\u015fmu\u015ftur. 2 , 0 ve 9 rakamlar\u0131 yanl\u0131\u015f yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak vekalet tarihi noter isminde hi\u00e7bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131kta yoktur. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc basit b\u00eer g\u00f6z bak\u0131\u015f\u0131yla vek\u00e2letname incelendi\u011finde tarihin daktilo ile yevmiye nosunun ise numarat\u00f6r ile bas\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclecektir,<\/p>\n

15- Tekrar etmek isterim ki t\u00fcm bunlar\u0131n benimle ilgisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi hukuki bir da\u011feri de yoktur. Ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131na kat\u0131lan avukat hakim huzurunda m\u00fcvekkili > benim avukat\u0131m demi\u015f ise hukuken konu bitmi\u015ftir, AYRICADA KONU ZATEN HUKUK\u0130D\u0130R.<\/p>\n

16-Bir savunma avukat\u0131n\u0131 siyasi tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n aras\u0131na atarak \u015fahs\u0131mla ilgili kamuoyunu, m\u00fcvekkillerimi yanl\u0131\u015f ve zihinlerinde sahtekar imaj\u0131 do\u011furacak \u015fekilde bu yay\u0131n\u0131 yay\u0131nlamak a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

17- \u0130NTERNET S\u0130TES\u0130 VARAN 4 HABER VE BELGES\u0130 \u0130LA VARAN 3 HABER. VE BELGES\u0130 GER\u00c7EK DI\u015eIDIR, S\u0130TE YAYININDAN KALDIRILMALIDIR.<\/p>\n

18- Bu durumu 17.12.2010 tarihinde saat 14.00 C\u0130VARINDA \u0130nternet sitesi i\u00e7erik sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131na internet \u00fczerinden hem talep dilek\u00e7emi hem de tekzip metnini g\u00f6nderdim. Ayr\u0131ca da ayn\u0131 tarihte kar-go ile muhataba hemn dilek\u00e7eyi hem de tekzip metninin g\u00f6nderdim, internet \u00fczerinden talebim hemen, kargo ile ilgili talebim ise 20.12.2010 tarihinde 09,53 saat itibariyle ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. YASA GERE\u011e\u0130 \u0130K\u0130 G\u00dcN GE\u00c7M\u0130\u015e VE TALEB\u0130M YER\u0130NE GET\u0130R\u0130LMEM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R. ( EK-6 Kargo ileti g\u00fcn ve saati)<\/p>\n

19- Ayr\u0131ca yine internet sitesi haberler ar\u015fivinde davalarla ilgili Kayseri seyahatimde otel masraflar\u0131n\u0131 benim kar\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131m ve Kayseri B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131land\u0131n iddias\u0131 vard\u0131r. Bu da internet sitesinde bulunmaktad\u0131r. Oysa bu haber ger\u00e7ek d\u0131\u015f\u0131d\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc otel masraflar\u0131m\u0131 ni\u00e7in ba\u015fkas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131las\u0131n. Ben otelde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131m s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde otelden ayr\u0131l\u0131rken pe\u015fin \u00f6deme \u00eele kendi \u00fccretimi nakil olarak \u00f6dedim. Bunu ispata da mecbur de\u011filim. Aksinin ispat\u0131 iddia sahibince yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

20- Benimle alakas\u0131 olmamakla birlikte otel yetkilileri zaten buna dair a\u00e7\u0131klama yapm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Bunu da ek olarak taraf\u0131n\u0131za sunuyorum.<\/p>\n

21- 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 yasan\u0131n 9. Maddesi gere\u011fince bu yanl\u0131\u015f yay\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve ekte sundu\u011fum tekzip metnimin yasa gere\u011fi b\u00eer hafta s\u00fcre ile birinci sayfada yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131n\u0131 arz ve talep ederim. 22.12.2010<\/p>\n

Avukat Yakup ER\u0130KEL<\/p>\n

EKLER<\/p>\n

1- Vek\u00e2tetname Avukat Yusuf Erikel’e<\/p>\n

2- G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme tutana\u011f\u0131<\/p>\n

3- Tevkil belgesi<\/p>\n

4- Kayseri 2.A\u011f\u0131r Ceza mahkemesi karar \u00f6rne\u011fi ve mahkeme zab\u0131tlan ile dilek\u00e7e \u00f6rnekler;<\/p>\n

5- Avukat Yusuf Erikel taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6nderilen belge<\/p>\n

6- Kargo belgeleri<\/p>\n

7- \u0130\u00e7erik sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131na g\u00f6nderilen dilek\u00e7e (kargo ile)<\/p>\n

8- Tekzip metni ( kargo ile }<\/p>\n

9- \u0130\u00e7erik sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131ya internet \u00fczerinden g\u00f6nderilen \u00eeaep e maili<\/p>\n

10-i\u00e7er\u00eek sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131ya internet \u00fczerinden g\u00f6nderilen tekzip e maili<\/p>\n

TEKZ\u0130P METN\u0130<\/p>\n

Kayseri B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile ilgili siyas\u00ee iddialar aras\u0131na \u015fahs\u0131mda kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak m\u00fcvekkilime verdi\u011fim hukuk hizmetine dair \u00abvek\u00e2letim olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131m masraflarla ilgili > yanl\u0131\u015f ve kamuoyunu yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 haber ve belgeler yay\u0131nlanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Ben Say\u0131n Hac\u0131 Ali Hamurcu’nun vekili ofarak Kayseri 2.A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 2007 \/ 253 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131n\u0131, hem yerel mahkemede hem de Yarg\u0131tay d\u00fczeyinde vekil olarak takip ettim ve sonu\u00e7land\u0131rd\u0131m. Buna dair Vek\u00e2letnamenin asl\u0131 Ankara Yenimahalle 3. Noterli\u011fi’ndedir. Yetki belgesi ise mahkeme dosyas\u0131ndad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Ben avukat s\u0131fat\u0131yla vek\u00e2letname ve tevkil belgesi sunarak m\u00fcvekkil \u00eele birlikte yarg\u0131lamaya katildim, davay\u0131 takip ettim. Ayr\u0131ca ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 usul\u00fc gere\u011fi benim avukatl\u0131\u011f\u0131ma m\u00fcvekkil Hac\u0131 Ali Hamurcu duru\u015fmada onay vermi\u015ftir. Bu konuda hi\u00e7bir hukuki sorun yoktur.<\/p>\n

KALDIK\u0130; M\u00fcdafilik s\u0131fat\u0131, Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu’nun 9.12.1974 tarih ve 272 es. 447. karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda da belirtildi\u011fi gibi avukat san\u0131kla birlikte duru\u015fmaya gelerek h\u00e2kim huzurunda onu m\u00fcdafi olarak kabul etti\u011fini bildirdi\u011fi anda kazan\u0131lacak, ba\u015fkaca bir usul ve merasime gerek olmayacakt\u0131r. Zaten gerek CMUK 136 ve devam\u0131nda gerekse de, CMK 149 ve devam\u0131nda m\u00fcdafilik i\u00e7in herhangi bir usul veya merasim \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fka bir ifadeyle her hangi bir kurum veya organdan belge d\u00fczenlettirmesine gerek bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, gerek CMUK gerekse CMK da m\u00fcdafi s\u0131fatna haiz olmak i\u00e7in noterden vek\u00e2letname \u00e7\u0131kartman\u0131n \u015fart oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin bir en k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Ben Kayseri B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Say\u0131n Mehmet \u00d6zhaseki’yi g\u00f6revinden dolay\u0131 medyadan tan\u0131r\u0131m, iddia edilen tarzda hukuk ve etik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 hi\u00e7bir diyalo\u011fum bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Kayseri B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n hi\u00e7bir kurum ve kurulu\u015fu ile avukatl\u0131k irtibat\u0131m yoktur.<\/p>\n

Takip etti\u011fim dosya nedeniyle Ankara Kayseri aras\u0131ndaki seyahat, konaklama ve di\u011fer harcamalar taraf\u0131mdan yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bir hukuk\u00e7u olarak Her t\u00fcrl\u00fc siyasi tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda oldu\u011fumu, m\u00fcvekkile hukuki yard\u0131m d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda hi\u00e7bir ama\u00e7 ve davran\u0131\u015f i\u00e7erisinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131, hukuk\u00e7u kimli\u011fimden ba\u015fka hi\u00e7bir kimlik kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc maddi ve manevi tazminat haklar\u0131m\u0131 sakl\u0131 tuttu\u011fumu kamuoyuna sayg\u0131 ile sunar\u0131m. 17 12 2010<\/p>\n

Avukat Yakup ER\u0130KEL<\/p>\n

ANKARA 11. SULH CEZA MAHKEMES\u0130 DE\u011e\u0130\u015e\u0130K \u0130\u015e. KARAR<\/p>\n

DE\u011e\u0130\u015e\u0130K \u0130\u015e NO : 2010\/1559<\/p>\n

HAK\u0130M : ABDULLAH TANRIKULU 32389<\/p>\n

KAT\u0130P: BEK\u0130R ARABACI 127203<\/p>\n

TEKZ\u0130P TALEP EDEN : AVUKAT YAKUP ER\u0130KEL, Vekili Av. Murat Carng\u00fcl Akarlar<\/p>\n

Alt\u0131nda\u011f \/ ANKARA<\/p>\n

KAR\u015eI TARAF : CHP T\u00dcZEL K\u0130\u015e\u0130L\u0130\u011e\u0130, ANKARA<\/p>\n

TALEP : Tekzip Talebi.<\/p>\n

TALEP TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 22\/12\/2010<\/p>\n

KARAR TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 24\/12\/2010<\/p>\n

Talepte bulunan Avukat Yakup Erikel 22\/12\/2010 havale tarihli dilek\u00e7esi ile, kendisi hakk\u0131nda www. chp.org.tr adresli i\u00e7erik sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131ndan yay\u0131nlanan ger\u00e7ek d\u0131\u015f\u0131 yay\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak i\u00e7eri\u011fin yay\u0131ndan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve dilek\u00e7eleri ekindeki cevap ve d\u00fczeltme metninin yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015f olmakla dilek\u00e7e ve ekleri, incelendi.<\/p>\n

GERE\u011e\u0130 D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc:<\/p>\n

CHP t\u00fczel ki\u015fili\u011fine ait www.chp.org.tr isimli i\u00e7erik sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131nda yay\u0131nlanan, haberin bulundu\u011fu sayfada tekzip talebinde bulunan hakk\u0131nda ” Av. Yakup Erikel, Hac\u0131 Ali Hamurcu isimli \u015fahs\u0131m avukat\u0131md\u0131r, Avukat\u0131 ise vekaleti nerededir. Dosyada bulunan vekaletin noter kayd\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re, dosyada sahte vekalet kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Adalet Bakan\u0131 neden hala bu olayla ilgili olarak bir sorutturma a\u00e7t\u0131rmamaktad\u0131r.”, ” Av. Yakup Erikel, Hac\u0131 Ali Hamurcu isimli \u015fahs\u0131n avukat\u0131 ise ve bu \u015fahs\u0131n Kayseri B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 ile bu dosyada has\u0131m olduklar\u0131 kesin iken. Av. Yakup Erikel’in bu dava ile ilgili olarak Kayseri’de bulundu\u011fu g\u00fcnlerde konaklad\u0131\u011f\u0131 otel faturalar\u0131n\u0131 neden kar\u015f\u0131 taraf olan Kayseri B\u00fcyi\u0131k\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6demi\u015ftir. ” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 haberinde yaz\u0131lan yaz\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011finde aktar\u0131lan haberin talepte bulunan\u0131n ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal edici nitelikte oldu\u011fu bu \u015fekildeki yay\u0131n\u0131n cevap ve d\u00fczeltme hakk\u0131 do\u011furacak nitelikte bulundu\u011fu kanaatine var\u0131lmakla talebin kabul\u00fcne karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

H\u00dcK\u00dcM:<\/p>\n

Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 yasan\u0131n 9\/2 maddesi gere\u011fince www.chp.org.tr. Adresinde talep sahibi hakk\u0131ndaki yaz\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011finin yay\u0131ndan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve cevap metninin bir hafta s\u00fcreyle internet ortam\u0131na yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131nda,<\/p>\n

Karar\u0131n taraftara tebli\u011fine,<\/p>\n

Karara kar\u015f\u0131 tebell\u00fc\u011f tarihinden itibaren 7 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde N\u00f6bet\u00e7i Asliye Ceza Mahkemesine itiraz olunabilece\u011fine.<\/p>\n

Dosya \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan inceleme sonunda karar verildi. 24.12.2010<\/p>\n

Hakim: 32389<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ER\u0130KEL`\u0130N CEVABI CHP`N\u0130N S\u0130TES\u0130NDE 24.04.2011 ANKARA – Mahkeme, CHP`nin internet sitesinde yay\u0131nlanan, avukat Yakup Erikel ile ilgili yaz\u0131n\u0131n yay\u0131ndan kald\u0131r\u0131larak, Erikel`in cevab\u0131n\u0131n, s\u00f6z konusu internet sitesinde bir hafta s\u00fcre ile yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131na karar verdi. Mahkemenin, 24 Aral\u0131k 2010 tarih ANKARA- Mahkeme, CHP`nin internet sitesinde yay\u0131nlanan, avukat Yakup Erikel ile ilgili yaz\u0131n\u0131n yay\u0131ndan kald\u0131r\u0131larak, Erikel`in cevab\u0131n\u0131n, s\u00f6z konusu internet sitesinde bir hafta…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[22,153,160],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1394","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-5651-nolu-kanun","category-9-madde","category-chp"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7wjA8-mu","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1394","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1394"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1394\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1397,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1394\/revisions\/1397"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1394"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1394"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1394"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}