{"id":1607,"date":"2015-08-13T11:57:09","date_gmt":"2015-08-13T08:57:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=1607"},"modified":"2016-05-27T12:00:43","modified_gmt":"2016-05-27T09:00:43","slug":"twitter-sansurlemede-dunya-lideriyiz","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=1607","title":{"rendered":"Twitter sans\u00fcrlemede d\u00fcnya lideriyiz"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\n

YAMAN AKDEN\u0130Z @cyberrights<\/strong><\/p>\n

Her alt\u0131 ayda bir oldu\u011fu gibi Twitter, 2015 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n ilk alt\u0131 ay\u0131 i\u00e7in \u015eeffafl\u0131k Raporu\u2019nu a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131. Raporda yay\u0131nlanan en \u00e7arp\u0131c\u0131 istatistiki bilgi, d\u00fcnya genelinde Twitter\u2019a 1 Ocak 2015 ve 30 Haziran 2015 tarihleri aras\u0131nda 442 mahkeme i\u00e7erik \u00e7\u0131karma talebinin g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 ve bu taleplerden b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funun, yani 408 tanesinin T\u00fcrkiye\u2019den g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olmas\u0131. Bu yetmezmi\u015f gibi mahkemeler d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, h\u00fck\u00fcmet organlar\u0131, polis veya T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de T\u0130B gibi kurumlardan g\u00f6nderilen 5 bin 651 talebin de en \u00e7o\u011fu, yani 310 tanesi T\u00fcrkiye\u2019den g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f.<\/p>\n

Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019den gelen toplam 752 talebin y\u00fczde 34\u2019\u00fc kadar\u0131yla ilgili i\u015flem yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve \u00fclke bazl\u0131 i\u00e7erik gizleme politikas\u0131n\u0131 (country withheld content policy) uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtiyor Twitter. \u015eeffafl\u0131k Raporu\u2019nda bu \u015fikayetlerin toplam 1978 hesapla ilgili oldu\u011fu belirtilerek, 2015\u2019in ilk yar\u0131s\u0131nda Twitter toplam 125 hesab\u0131 gizledi\u011fini veya kapatt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtiyor.<\/p>\n

Twitter\u2019\u0131n d\u00fcnya genelinde 158 hesab\u0131 kapatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunduruldu\u011funda da y\u00fczde 79 oran\u0131nda ve en fazla hesab\u0131n buzland\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya kapat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fclke de T\u00fcrkiye. Bu 125 hesap d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda 22 hesap Rusya\u2019dan, 10 hesap Almanya\u2019dan, bir hesap da Brezilya\u2019dan kapanm\u0131\u015f.<\/p>\n

\u0130laveten gizlenen ve T\u00fcrkiye\u2019den g\u00f6z\u00fckmeyen, kullan\u0131lamayan veya kapat\u0131lan 125 hesab\u0131n yan\u0131s\u0131ra 2015\u2019in ilk yar\u0131s\u0131nda Twitter T\u00fcrkiye\u2019den at\u0131lan 1667 tweet\u2019i de gizledi\u011fini veya kald\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtiyor. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, d\u00fcnya genelinde kald\u0131r\u0131lan 2 bin 354 tweet\u2019in y\u00fczde 70\u2019i de T\u00fcrkiye\u2019den kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f durumda. Bizimkilerden ba\u015fka Brezilya\u2019dan 403, Japonya\u2019dan 220 ve Rusya\u2019dan 56 tweet kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f.<\/p>\n

2015 verileri hi\u00e7 \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 de\u011fil<\/h4>\n

Asl\u0131nda Twitter\u2019\u0131n \u015feffafl\u0131k raporlar\u0131n\u0131 yak\u0131ndan takip edenler i\u00e7in 2015 verileri hi\u00e7 de \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 olmad\u0131.<\/p>\n

2014\u2019\u00fcn ikinci yar\u0131s\u0131 i\u00e7in de benzer bir durum s\u00f6z konusuydu. O d\u00f6nemde de T\u00fcrkiye bir numarayd\u0131 ve d\u00fcnya genelinde g\u00f6nderilen 376 mahkeme i\u00e7erik \u00e7\u0131karma talebinin 328 tanesi ve mahkemeler d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda 149 talep T\u00fcrkiye\u2019den g\u00f6nderilmi\u015fti. Toplam 477 talep 2b bin 642 hesapla ilgiliydi ve Twitter verilerine g\u00f6re bu hesaplardan 62 tanesi gizlenmi\u015f veya kapat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, benzer \u015fekilde de 1820 tweet \u00fclke bazl\u0131 i\u00e7erik gizleme politikas\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde gizlenmi\u015f veya kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

As\u0131l \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 olan\u2026<\/h4>\n

Twitter \u015feffafl\u0131k raporlar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fc incelendi\u011finde as\u0131l \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 olan, 2012 y\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7inde toplam sadece bir mahkeme karar\u0131 ve alt\u0131 di\u011fer talebin g\u00f6nderilmesi ve Twitter\u2019\u0131n da \u015fikayet edilen 16 hesapla ilgili hi\u00e7bir \u015fey yapmamas\u0131yla ba\u015flayan s\u00fcre\u00e7. 2013 i\u00e7in de T\u00fcrkiye\u2019den sadece 32 Twitter hesab\u0131yla ilgili toplam be\u015f mahkeme karar\u0131 ve d\u00f6r di\u011fer talep g\u00f6nderilmi\u015fken, Twitter 2013 i\u00e7inde de bu \u015fikayetlerle ilgili olarak hi\u00e7 bir i\u015flem yapmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

\u0130lk sanc\u0131l\u0131 d\u00f6nem 2014\u2019\u00fcn ilk yar\u0131s\u0131 olmu\u015f ve bundan sonra da yukar\u0131da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere talepler ve kald\u0131rma ve gizleme uygulamalar\u0131nda T\u00fcrkiye\u2019yi d\u00fcnya birincili\u011fine g\u00f6t\u00fcren s\u00fcre\u00e7 ba\u015flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere 17-25 Aral\u0131k 2013 yolsuzluk soru\u015fturmalar\u0131ndan sonra h\u00fck\u00fcmet taraf\u0131ndan ilk m\u00fcdahale yap\u0131lan alanlardan bir tanesi internet ve sosyal medya olmu\u015ftu. \u015eubat 2014 i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019a \u2018ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlali\u2019<\/strong> (Madde 9) ve \u2018\u00f6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fi\u2019<\/strong> (Madde 9A) nedeniyle i\u00e7eri\u011fe eri\u015fimin engellenmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, bu de\u011ferlendirme ve g\u00f6rev Sulh Ceza hakimliklerine verilmi\u015f, kararlar\u0131n tek elden tebli\u011fi ve uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Eri\u015fim Sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131 Birli\u011fi kurulmu\u015ftu.<\/p>\n

\u2018Elimizden ne gelirse yap\u0131yoruz\u2019 politikas\u0131<\/h4>\n

Bu yerel sans\u00fcr mekanizmas\u0131n\u0131n aksamamas\u0131 i\u00e7in tek engel Twitter\u2019\u0131n kendisiydi. T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin az say\u0131da da olsa 2012 ve 2013 taleplerini umursamayan Twitter\u2019\u0131n yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 de\u011fi\u015ftirecek hamle 30 Mart 2014 se\u00e7imlerinden \u00f6nce geldi ve Twitter\u2019a ilk topyek\u00fcn engelleme 20 Mart 2014 tarihinde yap\u0131ld\u0131. Her ne kadar Twitter Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin 2 Nisan 2014 tarihli tarihi karar\u0131yla tekrardan a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olsa dahi bu engelleme Twitter y\u00f6neticilerini fazlas\u0131yla tedirgin etmi\u015fti. S\u0131kla\u015fan San Francisco-Dublin-Ankara g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeleri sonras\u0131nda Twitter s\u0131kl\u0131kla \u00fclke bazl\u0131 i\u00e7erik gizleme politikas\u0131n\u0131 (\u2018country withheld content policy\u2019<\/strong>) T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de uygulamaya ba\u015flad\u0131.<\/p>\n

Bug\u00fcne kadar verilmis\u0327 \u00e7es\u0327itli Sulh Ceza Hakimlik kararlar\u0131 dikkatle incelendig\u0306inde engellemelerin temel hedefinin \u00f6zellikle yolsuzluk, devlet s\u0327iddeti ve siyasi fig\u00fcrlere y\u00f6nelen eles\u0327tiriler vb. nedenler oldug\u0306u anlas\u0327\u0131lmakta. Siyasi ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcg\u0306\u00fcn\u00fc ilgilendiren bu t\u00fcr konular\u0131n kamuoyunun yak\u0131n denetimine tabi olmas\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla koruma alan\u0131n\u0131n daha genis\u0327 yorumlanmas\u0131 beklenmekteyken genelde muhalif hesaplar\u0131n engellendi\u011fi, gizlendi\u011fi veya bu hesaplardan at\u0131lan tweet\u2019lerin ask\u0131ya al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya silindi\u011fi dikkat \u00e7ekmekte.<\/p>\n

Her ne kadar son raporunda Twitter 2015\u2019in ilk alt\u0131 ay\u0131nda \u00f6nlerine gelen 408 mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fczde 60\u2019\u0131na, yani yakla\u015f\u0131k 245 tanesine itiraz etti\u011fini beyan etse de bunlardan sadece 12 tanesinde (y\u00fczde 5) ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 olmu\u015f. Bunun ne anlama geldi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klamak gerekirse, Twitter T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de bir nevi \u2018Elimizden ne gelirse yap\u0131yoruz\u2019<\/strong> politikas\u0131 uyguluyor. \u2018Hukuki s\u00fcre\u00e7leri takip ediyoruz, itirazlar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131 yap\u0131yoruz ama sonu\u00e7 olarak da T\u00fcrkiye\u2019den bir daha eri\u015fime engellenmek istemiyoruz\u2019<\/strong> diyorlar. Bu kapsamda da \u2018mecburen\u2019<\/strong> uygulad\u0131klar\u0131 \u00fclke bazl\u0131 i\u00e7erik gizleme politikas\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki engellemeler ve gizlemeler son s\u00fcrat devam ediyor.<\/p>\n

\"twitter<\/p>\n

Artarak devam edecek<\/h4>\n

Bu vahim durumun 2015\u2019in ikinci yar\u0131s\u0131nda da art\u0131\u015fla devam edece\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclecek.<\/p>\n

\u00d6zellikle 24.07.2015 tarihinde I\u015e\u0130D, PKK ve DHKP\/C \u00f6rg\u00fctlerine y\u00f6nelik operasyonlar\u0131n ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131yla birlikte ba\u015fbakanl\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015flat\u0131lan paralel operasyonla 5651 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un yeni 8A maddesine dayanarak \u00e7ok say\u0131da K\u00fcrt haber sitesiyle birlikte benzer \u015fekilde i\u00e7lerinde gazeteci ve aktivistlerin de yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7ok say\u0131da K\u00fcrt kullan\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n da Twitter hesab\u0131na eri\u015fimin engellenmesine G\u00f6lba\u015f\u0131 Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan karar verildi ve arka arkaya benzer kararlar verilmekte.<\/p>\n

Twittar\u2019a d\u00fc\u015fen<\/h4>\n

Haberles\u0327me \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcg\u0306\u00fc ve ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcg\u0306\u00fc bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Twitter\u2019a alternatif bir platformun bulundug\u0306unu s\u00f6ylemek kolay deg\u0306il. Bu nedenle kamusal bir tart\u0131s\u0327ma platformu haline gelmis\u0327 Twitter\u2019\u0131n kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n haklar\u0131, basit bir ticari karar alma s\u00fcrecinin \u00f6tesinde koruma g\u00f6rmeli. Bu husus, konusu siyasi ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcg\u0306\u00fcn\u00fc olus\u0327turan durumlarda daha da hassas.<\/p>\n

Mevcut T\u00fcrkiye politikas\u0131 ve uygulamas\u0131yla Twitter\u2019\u0131n demokratikle\u015fme s\u00fcrecine bir katk\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011fu veya ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc korudu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fil. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, Twitter\u2019\u0131n bir an \u00f6nce T\u00fcrkiye politikas\u0131n\u0131 tekrardan de\u011ferlendirmesi gerekmekte.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Yaman Akdeniz, 13.08.2015 tarihinde Diken i\u00e7in yazd\u0131 YAMAN AKDEN\u0130Z @cyberrights Her alt\u0131 ayda bir oldu\u011fu gibi Twitter, 2015 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n ilk alt\u0131 ay\u0131 i\u00e7in \u015eeffafl\u0131k Raporu\u2019nu a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131. Raporda yay\u0131nlanan en \u00e7arp\u0131c\u0131 istatistiki bilgi, d\u00fcnya genelinde Twitter\u2019a 1 Ocak 2015 ve 30 Haziran 2015 tarihleri aras\u0131nda 442 mahkeme i\u00e7erik \u00e7\u0131karma talebinin g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 ve bu taleplerden b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funun, yani 408 tanesinin T\u00fcrkiye\u2019den…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1608,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[3,189,78],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1607","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-sansur","category-twitter","category-yaman-akdeniz"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Twitter_sansur.jpg?fit=795%2C470&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7wjA8-pV","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1607","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1607"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1607\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1609,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1607\/revisions\/1609"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1608"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1607"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1607"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1607"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}