{"id":1627,"date":"2016-06-09T15:04:13","date_gmt":"2016-06-09T12:04:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=1627"},"modified":"2016-06-09T15:04:13","modified_gmt":"2016-06-09T12:04:13","slug":"turkcellin-ensar-vakfi-elestirileri-ile-ilgili-aldirdigi-9-karara-daha-itiraz-ettik","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=1627","title":{"rendered":"Turkcell\u2019in Ensar Vakf\u0131 Ele\u015ftirileri ile ilgili Ald\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 9 Karara Daha \u0130tiraz Ettik"},"content":{"rendered":"

9 Haziran, 2016<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yaman Akdeniz ve Kerem Alt\u0131parmak taraf\u0131ndan 31 May\u0131s 2016 tarihinde Turkcell\u2019in talebi ile \u0130stanbul Anadolu 4. Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 yasan\u0131n 9\/3 maddesi gere\u011fince 2016\/2091 D.\u0130\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 ve 01.04.2016 tarihli karar\u0131yla 743 Twitter kullan\u0131c\u0131s\u0131na ait 862 tweet hakk\u0131nda eri\u015fimin engellemesi bireysel ba\u015fvuru yolu ile Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019ne ta\u015f\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

Yaman Akdeniz ve Kerem Alt\u0131parmak taraf\u0131ndan 8 Haziran 2016 tarihinde ise Turkcell taraf\u0131ndan ald\u0131r\u0131lan 9 farkl\u0131 eri\u015fim engelleme karar\u0131na daha \u201ckullan\u0131c\u0131 s\u0131fat\u0131\u201d ile itiraz edildi<\/strong>. \u0130tiraz edilen kararlarla 1678 farkl\u0131 tweet sans\u00fcrlenip, eri\u015fime engellenmi\u015ftir<\/strong>. Yaman Akdeniz ve Kerem Alt\u0131parmak taraf\u0131ndan itiraz edilen kararlar a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da s\u0131ralanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \u0130stanbul Anadolu 5. Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fi<\/strong> taraf\u0131ndan 190 farkl\u0131 tweet hakk\u0131nda verilen 2016\/2529 D.I\u0307s\u0327 say\u0131l\u0131 ve 12.05.2016 tarihli eri\u015fim engelleme karar\u0131<\/li>\n
  2. \u0130stanbul Anadolu 8. Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fi<\/strong> taraf\u0131ndan 266 farkl\u0131 tweet hakk\u0131nda verilen 2016\/2528 D.I\u0307s\u0327 say\u0131l\u0131 ve 22.04.2016 tarihli eri\u015fim engelleme karar\u0131<\/li>\n
  3. \u0130stanbul Anadolu 10. Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fi<\/strong> taraf\u0131ndan 114 farkl\u0131 tweet hakk\u0131nda verilen 2016\/2514 D.I\u0307s\u0327 say\u0131l\u0131 ve 09.05.2016 tarihli eri\u015fim engelleme karar\u0131<\/li>\n
  4. \u0130stanbul Anadolu 1. Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fi<\/strong> taraf\u0131ndan 174 farkl\u0131 tweet hakk\u0131nda verilen 2016\/1997 D.I\u0307s\u0327 say\u0131l\u0131 ve 25.03.2016 tarihli eri\u015fim engelleme karar\u0131<\/li>\n
  5. \u0130stanbul Anadolu 10. Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fi<\/strong> taraf\u0131ndan 217 farkl\u0131 tweet hakk\u0131nda verilen 2016\/2233 D.I\u0307s\u0327 say\u0131l\u0131 ve 29.04.2016 tarihli eri\u015fim engelleme karar\u0131<\/li>\n
  6. \u0130stanbul Anadolu 1. Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fi<\/strong> taraf\u0131ndan 152 farkl\u0131 tweet hakk\u0131nda verilen gere\u011fince 2016\/2206 D.I\u0307s\u0327 say\u0131l\u0131 ve 14.04.2016 tarihli eri\u015fim engelleme karar\u0131<\/li>\n
  7. \u0130stanbul Anadolu 6. Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fi<\/strong> taraf\u0131ndan 184 farkl\u0131 tweet hakk\u0131nda verilen 2016\/2682 D.I\u0307s\u0327 say\u0131l\u0131 ve 20.05.2016 tarihli eri\u015fim engelleme karar\u0131<\/li>\n
  8. talebiyle \u0130stanbul Anadolu 6. Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fi<\/strong> taraf\u0131ndan 185 farkl\u0131 tweet hakk\u0131nda verilen 2016\/2683 D.I\u0307s\u0327 say\u0131l\u0131 ve 20.05.2016 tarihli eri\u015fim engelleme karar\u0131<\/li>\n
  9. \u0130stanbul Anadolu 6. Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fi<\/strong> taraf\u0131ndan 196 farkl\u0131 tweet hakk\u0131nda verilen 2016\/2685 D.I\u0307s\u0327 say\u0131l\u0131 ve 20.05.2016 tarihli eri\u015fim engelleme karar\u0131<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Bu kararlarda g\u00f6ze \u00e7arpan en \u00f6nemli \u00f6zellik kararlarda yeterli bir yarg\u0131sal incelemenin yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, k\u0131sa ve genel de\u011ferlendirmelerle talep eden y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar verilmesi ve toplamda 1678 talepten tek bir talebin daha reddedilmemesidir. Baz\u0131 kararlarda hi\u00e7 bir hukuki de\u011ferlendirme yer almazken, bir \u00e7o\u011funda sadece Kanun maddeleri s\u0131ralanm\u0131\u015f fakat y\u00fczlerce tweetin neden eri\u015fime engellenmesi gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7elendirilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

    Bu kararlar\u0131n hi\u00e7 birinde ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctleri dikkate al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015f, Turkcell ve Ensar Vakf\u0131 hakk\u0131nda yaz\u0131lan her \u015fey kategoriksel olarak hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Yaman Akdeniz Kerem Alt\u0131parmak taraf\u0131ndan hakimliklere sunulan itiraz dilek\u00e7elerinde engellenen tweetlerden \u00f6rnekler de verilerek eri\u015fime engellenen i\u00e7eriklerin siyasi tart\u0131\u015fma ortam\u0131na katk\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n olduk\u00e7a y\u00fcksek oldu\u011fu ele\u015ftiri mahiyetindeki tweetlerin neden eri\u015fime engellendi\u011finin hakimlik kararlar\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca, hakimlik kararlar\u0131nda Turkcell \u015firketinin ne \u015fekilde zarar g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klanmam\u0131\u015f veya gerek\u00e7elendirilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

    Turkcell \u015firketi taraf\u0131ndan benzer eri\u015fim engelleme kararlar\u0131 al\u0131nmaya devam edildi\u011fi bilinmektedir. Benzer kararlar elimize ge\u00e7tik\u00e7e, hepsine tek tek itiraz edece\u011fimizi ve konunun takip\u00e7ileri oldu\u011fumuzu kamuoyunun bilgisine sunar\u0131z.<\/p>\n

    Yaman Akdeniz & Kerem Alt\u0131parmak<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    9 Haziran, 2016 Yaman Akdeniz ve Kerem Alt\u0131parmak taraf\u0131ndan 31 May\u0131s 2016 tarihinde Turkcell\u2019in talebi ile \u0130stanbul Anadolu 4. Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 yasan\u0131n 9\/3 maddesi gere\u011fince 2016\/2091 D.\u0130\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 ve 01.04.2016 tarihli karar\u0131yla 743 Twitter kullan\u0131c\u0131s\u0131na ait 862 tweet hakk\u0131nda eri\u015fimin engellemesi bireysel ba\u015fvuru yolu ile Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019ne ta\u015f\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Yaman Akdeniz ve Kerem Alt\u0131parmak taraf\u0131ndan 8 Haziran…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1612,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[22,153,5,209,21,142,3,208,78],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1627","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-5651-nolu-kanun","category-9-madde","category-dusunce-ozgurlugu","category-ensar-vakfi","category-erisim-engelleme","category-kerem-altiparmak","category-sansur","category-turkcell","category-yaman-akdeniz"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Ensar_map.jpg?fit=2098%2C1056&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7wjA8-qf","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1627","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1627"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1627\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1628,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1627\/revisions\/1628"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1612"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1627"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1627"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1627"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}