{"id":195,"date":"2008-10-27T18:56:02","date_gmt":"2008-10-27T15:56:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=195"},"modified":"2008-10-27T19:31:23","modified_gmt":"2008-10-27T16:31:23","slug":"internete-girmek-tehlikeli-ve-yasaktir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=195","title":{"rendered":"\u0130nternete girmek tehlikeli ve yasakt\u0131r"},"content":{"rendered":"

NTVMSNBC: \u0130nternete girmek tehlikeli ve yasakt\u0131r<\/a><\/p>\n

T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de \u0130nternet \u00fczerindeki i\u00e7eri\u011fin d\u00fczenlenmesi ve kitlesel sans\u00fcr uygulamalar\u0131n\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131karan yasalar b\u00fcy\u00fck tart\u0131\u015fma yarat\u0131yor. Hem kullan\u0131c\u0131lar, hem hukuk\u00e7ular ortak bir paydada bulu\u015fuyor: Yasalar yetersiz, uygulan\u0131\u015f\u0131 hatal\u0131…”<\/p>\n

Meri\u00e7 Kara, NTV-MSNBC, G\u00fcncelleme: 16:44 TS\u0130 27 Ekim 2008 Pazartesi<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u0130STANBUL – Devaml\u0131 olarak sans\u00fcrle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131yay\u0131z, bug\u00fcn engellenen siteler ertesi g\u00fcn kar\u015f\u0131 dava a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131nca kullan\u0131ma tekrar a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131yor. Yaln\u0131zca T\u00fcrkiye i\u00e7indeki kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n bilgiye eri\u015fimini k\u0131s\u0131tlayan bu durum, sadece T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti vatanda\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011fil, yurt i\u00e7inde ya\u015fayan yabanc\u0131 \u00fclke vatanda\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n da haber alma \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerini k\u0131s\u0131tl\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

Ge\u00e7ti\u011fimiz Cuma g\u00fcn\u00fc ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen Blogger.com sitesine ula\u015f\u0131m\u0131n engellenmesi \u00f6zellikle internet kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan b\u00fcy\u00fck tepkiyle kar\u015f\u0131land\u0131. Bir\u00e7ok kullan\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n birincil ileti\u015fim ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131layan e-g\u00fcnl\u00fckleri kapat\u0131l\u0131nca tepki san\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan daha b\u00fcy\u00fck oldu. Digiturk taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan dava sonucu Blogger.com\u2019un engellenmesi, davaya sebep olan Lig TV yay\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u015fekilde internet \u00fczerinden izletilmesine engel olmad\u0131.<\/p>\n

1993 y\u0131l\u0131ndan beri \u0130nternet ve \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 konusunda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar yapan, \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki g\u00fcnlerde Ankara \u00dcniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fak\u00fcltesi \u00f6\u011fretim \u00fcyesi Yrd. Do\u00e7. Dr. Kerem Alt\u0131parmak ile beraber haz\u0131rlad\u0131klar\u0131 \u201c\u0130nternet: Girilmesi Tehlikeli ve Yasakt\u0131r: T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de \u0130nternet \u0130\u00e7erik D\u00fczenlemesi ve Sans\u00fcre \u0130li\u015fkin Ele\u015ftirel Bir De\u011ferlendirme\u201d isimli 80 sayfal\u0131k rapor\/kitab\u0131 ile \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki g\u00fcnlerde kamuoyu yaratma amac\u0131 g\u00fcden, Siber Haklar ve \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckler Organizasyonu kurucu y\u00f6neticisi ve Leeds \u00dcniversitesi Hukuk Fak\u00fcltesi \u00f6\u011fretim \u00fcyesi Do\u00e7. Dr. Yaman Akdeniz bu konuyu \u015fu \u015fekilde de\u011ferlendiriyor:<\/p>\n

\u201cDigit\u00fcrk\u2019\u00fcn Lig TV yay\u0131n haklar\u0131n\u0131 korumaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 ve \u0130nternet \u00fczerinden korsan yay\u0131n yapan sitelerle ve sistemlerle m\u00fccadele etmesi \u00e7ok do\u011fald\u0131r ve buna zaten kimse kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131km\u0131yor. Fakat ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan hak ihlali ile mahkemenin vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu tedbir ama\u00e7l\u0131 koruma mekanizmas\u0131 olan eri\u015fim
\nengelleme karar\u0131nda \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fczl\u00fck var. Bu, \u00f6rnek vermek gerekirse mangal yaparken orman yakmaya benziyor. Mangal\u0131n yanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in orman\u0131n yak\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek yok. Tepki \u00e7eken de zaten bu yakla\u015f\u0131m.<\/p>\n

Blogger.com\u2019a eri\u015fimin engellenmesi, Digit\u00fcrk taraf\u0131ndan eri\u015fimi engellenmi\u015f olan ve korsan yay\u0131n yapan di\u011fer MyP2P gibi sitelerden farkl\u0131. Genelde korsan streaming yapan sitelerin tamam\u0131nda kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 streaming yap\u0131l\u0131yor. Fakat Blogger.com\u2019da b\u00f6yle bir durum s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fil. Alan ad\u0131 ve sunucu baz\u0131nda Blogger.com gibi bir siteye eri\u015fim engellendi\u011fi zaman y\u00fcz binlerce ki\u015fi bundan etkileniyor; hem e-g\u00fcnl\u00fck sahibi olanlar hem de bu bloglar\u0131n okuyucular\u0131. Verilen karar\u0131n ikincil hasarlar\u0131 \u00fczerinde durulmam\u0131\u015f. \u0130nsan haklar\u0131 ve d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ve Anayasaya\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k konusunda bir inceleme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f. E\u011fer yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olsayd\u0131 mahkeme zaten Blogger.com\u2019un tamam\u0131na eri\u015fim engelleme karar\u0131 vermezdi ve vermemeliydi.\u201d<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

SANS\u00dcR S\u00dcREKL\u0130 DEVAM ED\u0130YOR<\/strong>
\nDevaml\u0131 bir \u015fekilde sans\u00fcrle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya oldu\u011fumuzu belirten Akdeniz, eri\u015fim engellemenin hem i\u00e7erik \u00fcreten yazarlar\u0131, hem de i\u00e7erikten beslenen okuyucular\u0131 etkiledi\u011finin alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7iziyor. Sans\u00fcr ve engelleme y\u00f6ntemlerinin demokratik toplumlarda yaln\u0131zca istisnai durumlarda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi gerekti\u011fini belirten Akdeniz, bu s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k ve net olarak, yoruma a\u00e7\u0131k kap\u0131 b\u0131rakmayacak \u015fekilde d\u00fczenlenmesi gerekti\u011fini belirtiyor. 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunun yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n olduk\u00e7a problemli oldu\u011funu ve 2 saatten daha k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcrede TBMM\u2019den ge\u00e7ti\u011fini belirten Akdeniz, uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n da bug\u00fcne kadar \u201ckeyfi\u201d \u015fekilde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, hakimler ve savc\u0131lar\u0131n yasay\u0131 tam olarak \u00f6\u011frenemedi\u011fini ya da bilin\u00e7li olarak yanl\u0131\u015f uygulad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ifade ediyor.<\/p>\n

\u0130LLEGAL AMA\u00c7LI S\u0130TELER KAPATILAB\u0130L\u0130R<\/strong>
\nD\u00fcnya\u2019n\u0131n hi\u00e7bir \u00fclkesinde \u00e7ocuk pornosu i\u00e7eren sitelere eri\u015fim engellemesi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda tepki al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten Akdeniz, kanunlar taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7ok a\u00e7\u0131k ve net olarak belirtilmi\u015f, da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m ve bulundurmas\u0131 genel anlamda yasak olan bir i\u00e7erik i\u00e7in uygulanan engellemelerin problem yaratmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 hat\u0131rlat\u0131yor. T\u00fcrkiye\u2019deki yakla\u015f\u0131mdaysa sitenin genel i\u00e7eri\u011fine bak\u0131lmadan, genel inceleme yap\u0131lmadan as\u0131l amac\u0131 illegal yay\u0131n yapmak olmayan YouTube, WordPress, Google Groups, Geocities, Blogger gibi siteler engellenebiliyor. \u0130nceledi\u011fi bir \u00e7ok eri\u015fim karar\u0131nda mahkemelerin hi\u00e7bir gerek\u00e7e vermedi\u011fini belirten Akdeniz, kararlara ula\u015fman\u0131n neredeyse imkans\u0131z oldu\u011funu, ne Anayasa, ne de insan haklar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan bir inceleme yap\u0131lmadan al\u0131nan kararlarda, baz\u0131 durumlarda karar\u0131n kimin taraf\u0131ndan verildi\u011finin bile bilinmedi\u011fini s\u00f6yl\u00fcyor.<\/p>\n

ENGELLEMELER \u0130LET\u0130\u015e\u0130M HAKKINI ELDEN ALIYOR<\/strong>
\n\u0130nternet sitelerinin engellenmesi, T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti vatanda\u015flar\u0131 gibi T\u00fcrkiye s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 i\u00e7inde ya\u015fayan yabanc\u0131 uyruklu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131 da vuruyor. Kendi \u00fclkelerinden uzakta ya\u015fayan yabanc\u0131lar\u0131n ileti\u015fim imkanlar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frudan ellerinden al\u0131nmas\u0131 T\u00fcrkiye ile ileti\u015fimi olan herkesi etkiliyor. Eri\u015fim engelleme kararlar\u0131n\u0131n ve politikalar\u0131n\u0131n ikincil zararlar\u0131ndan en \u00f6nemlisi olarak g\u00f6sterilen durum, yeni nesil internet uygulamalar\u0131 ve interaktif uygulama servisleri veren sitelerin as\u0131l ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n kanunsuz i\u015fler yapmak olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirten Akdeniz, YouTube, Blogger, Facebook gibi y\u00fczlerce servisin \u201ce\u011flence\u201d amac\u0131yla de\u011fil ileti\u015fim ve bilgi edinme amac\u0131yla kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n mahkemeler taraf\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ve bu servislere uygulanacak engellemelerin do\u011frudan insan haklar\u0131 ihlali oldu\u011funun fark\u0131na var\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirtiyor.<\/p>\n

Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n \u00f6zellikle 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunla ilgili uygulamadaki yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131klar\u0131n fark\u0131nda oldu\u011funu ifade eden Akdeniz\u2019e g\u00f6re mevcut uygulaman\u0131n daha fazla vakit kaybetmeden d\u00fczeltilmesi, savc\u0131l\u0131k ve mahkemelerin bir an \u00f6nce e\u011fitilmesi gerekiyor. Ayr\u0131ca Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n veya Ba\u015fbakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n yay\u0131nlayaca\u011f\u0131 bir genelge ile 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un y\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fc\u011fe girmesinden sonra kanuni uygulaman\u0131n ne \u015fekilde olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131k ve net bir \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 gerekiyor.<\/p>\n

KANUN DERHAL G\u00d6ZDEN GE\u00c7\u0130R\u0130LMEL\u0130<\/strong>
\nBili\u015fim d\u00fcnyas\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131, bili\u015fim hukuku uzmanlar\u0131 ve sivil toplum \u00f6rg\u00fctleri, 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunun uygulamada yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 problemlerin ancak ve ancak kanunun tekrar g\u00f6zden ge\u00e7irilmesiyle telafi edilebilece\u011fini s\u00fcrekli olarak ifade ediyor. Kanunun kald\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p i\u00e7inde eri\u015fim engelleme i\u00e7ermeyen bir politika geli\u015ftirilmesi gerekti\u011fini belirten Akdeniz, durumu \u015fu \u015fekilde \u00f6zetliyor:<\/p>\n

\u201c5651 numaral\u0131 kanunun amac\u0131 \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n zararl\u0131 i\u00e7eriklerden korunmas\u0131 idi. E\u011fer problem \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ise o zaman yeti\u015fkinleri de korumaya ihtiya\u00e7 yok. Ben bir yeti\u015fkin olarak hangi yay\u0131n zararl\u0131 hangisi de\u011fil kendim karar verebilirim. \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 i\u00e7in de \u00e7o\u00e7uklar\u0131n evde veya okullarda ya da internet cafelerde kulland\u0131klar\u0131 bilgisayarlara filtreleme yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131 konulabilir. O zaman site ve server baz\u0131nda eri\u015fim engellemesine gerek kalmaz. Fakat bug\u00fcne kadar ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131m\u0131z \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 bahane edilerek sans\u00fcr politikas\u0131 uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steriyor.\u201d <\/p>\n

\u0130NTERNET NASIL D\u00dcZENLENMEL\u0130<\/strong>
\nAkdeniz, telif haklar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131, ki\u015fisel sald\u0131r\u0131lar\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi ve 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunda bulunan 9 kusurlu hareketin cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n sans\u00fcr ve efektif olmayan eri\u015fim engelleme kararlar\u0131 ile m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtiyor:<\/p>\n

\u201c8. maddedeki katalog su\u00e7lar i\u00e7in izlenmesi gereken uygulama gayet a\u00e7\u0131k ve net asl\u0131nda. Sadece ve sadece bu 8+1 su\u00e7la ilgili eri\u015fim engelleme karar\u0131 verilebilir. Mahkemeler d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda baz\u0131 durumlarda Kanun, 8. maddenin 4. f\u0131kras\u0131 ile Telekom\u00fcnikasyon \u0130leti\u015fim Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na re\u2019sen \u201cidari eri\u015fim engelleme karar\u0131\u201d alma yetkisi de vermektedir. Bu t\u00fcr i\u00e7erik ta\u015f\u0131yan web siteleri, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de iseler kapat\u0131labilir veya sitelere eri\u015fim engellenir, yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda iseler eri\u015fim sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131lar arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla filtrelenebilirler.<\/p>\n

Bu benim destekledi\u011fim ya da inand\u0131\u011f\u0131m bir sistem de\u011fil fakat kanun yap\u0131c\u0131lar sadece ve sadece bu istisnai durumlar i\u00e7in eri\u015fim engelleme yap\u0131labilece\u011fini belirtmi\u015f. Ama mesela bu maddenin web 2.0 servisi veren sitelere uygulanmamas\u0131 laz\u0131m. Ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde ne kadar efektif oldu\u011fu da tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131r ve kanun interneti sadece bir dizi web sitesinden ibaretmi\u015f gibi g\u00f6zlemliyor, bunun da ne kadar do\u011fru oldu\u011fu tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Bu istisnai kamu su\u00e7lar\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki \u00f6zel hukuk ve ki\u015fisel haklarla ilgili durumlarda 5651 gere\u011fi 9. Madde uygulanmas\u0131 gerekiyor. 9. Madde\u2019de \u201cengelleme\u201d ya da \u201ceri\u015fim engellemesi\u201d tabirleri kullan\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f, sadece \u201cyay\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma\u201d kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f. Kanunda hak ihlali konusunda eri\u015fim engellemesi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f. Yasa koyucu tercihini 9. Madde\u2019de eri\u015fim engellemeden yana kullanmam\u0131\u015f.<\/p>\n

Bu durumda asl\u0131nda eri\u015fim engelleme karar\u0131 sadece 8. Madde\u2019de \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen katalog su\u00e7lar i\u00e7in uygulanabilir. Bir de di\u011fer \u00f6zel kanunlarda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ise – mesela telif haklar\u0131…<\/p>\n

9. Madde\u2019nin 23 May\u0131s 2007 tarihinden beri y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte oldu\u011fu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fcnde bulunduruldu\u011funda, an\u0131lan tarihten beri hakaret konusunda, \u00f6zellikle Adnan Hoca taraf\u0131ndan ki\u015fisel haklarla ilgili \u00e7e\u015fitli mahkemelerden al\u0131nan eri\u015fim engelleme kararlar\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Telih haklar\u0131 konusunda 5846 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun ek 4\u2019nci maddesi uygulan\u0131yor. Bu asl\u0131nda kademeli bir yakla\u015f\u0131m, \u00f6nce ihbar yoluyla kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011fin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 isteniyor, bu ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 olmaz ise o zaman eri\u015fim engelleme yoluna gidiliyor. Bu uygulamadaki problemler de Blogger.com\u2019a eri\u015fimin engellemesi ile ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. Mahkemelerin, web 2.0 tabanl\u0131, as\u0131l amac\u0131 illegal yay\u0131n yay\u0131nlamak olmayan sitelere eri\u015fim engellemesi karar\u0131 vermemesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

Genelde ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan hak ihlali ile mahkemelerin vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu tedbir ma\u00e7l\u0131 koruma mekanizmas\u0131 olan eri\u015fim engelleme kararlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fczl\u00fck oldu\u011fu ortaya \u00e7\u0131k\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

Dikkat \u00e7ekilmesi gereken son durum T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de \u0130nternet i\u00e7erik yasaklamas\u0131 konusunda adil bir yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmamas\u0131d\u0131r. Eri\u015fim engelleme kararlar\u0131 \u00f6ncesinde, Vatan gazetesi engellemesinde de g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gibi kapat\u0131lacak siteye hi\u00e7bir savunma hakk\u0131 verilmedi\u011finden, hatta kararlar tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011finden eri\u015fimi engellenen sitelere savunma hakk\u0131 tan\u0131nmamaktad\u0131r. Bunun ad\u0131 yarg\u0131 yoluyla yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131s\u0131z infaz ve sans\u00fcrd\u00fcr.\u201d<\/p>\n

Yaman Akdeniz ve Kerem Alt\u0131parmak taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan \u0130nternet: Girilmesi Tehlikeli ve Yasakt\u0131r: T\u00fcrkiye’de \u0130nternet \u0130\u00e7erik D\u00fczenlemesi ve Sans\u00fcre \u0130li\u015fkin Ele\u015ftirel Bir De\u011ferlendirme<\/em> raporu kitap olarak \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 ortak Platformu (\u0130HOP) taraf\u0131ndan Kas\u0131m 2008 i\u00e7inde yay\u0131nlanacakt\u0131r. Kitab\u0131n PDF versiyonuna cyber-rights.org.tr adresinden ula\u015fmak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olacakt\u0131r.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

NTVMSNBC: \u0130nternete girmek tehlikeli ve yasakt\u0131r T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de \u0130nternet \u00fczerindeki i\u00e7eri\u011fin d\u00fczenlenmesi ve kitlesel sans\u00fcr uygulamalar\u0131n\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131karan yasalar b\u00fcy\u00fck tart\u0131\u015fma yarat\u0131yor. Hem kullan\u0131c\u0131lar, hem hukuk\u00e7ular ortak bir paydada bulu\u015fuyor: Yasalar yetersiz, uygulan\u0131\u015f\u0131 hatal\u0131…” Meri\u00e7 Kara, NTV-MSNBC, G\u00fcncelleme: 16:44 TS\u0130 27 Ekim 2008 Pazartesi \u0130STANBUL – Devaml\u0131 olarak sans\u00fcrle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131yay\u0131z, bug\u00fcn engellenen siteler ertesi g\u00fcn kar\u015f\u0131 dava a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131nca kullan\u0131ma tekrar…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[22,5,21,36,28,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-195","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-5651-nolu-kanun","category-dusunce-ozgurlugu","category-erisim-engelleme","category-fikri-haklar","category-hakaret","category-sansur"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7wjA8-39","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=195"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=195"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=195"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=195"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}