{"id":213,"date":"2008-10-30T12:19:51","date_gmt":"2008-10-30T09:19:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=213"},"modified":"2008-10-30T12:19:53","modified_gmt":"2008-10-30T09:19:53","slug":"bianet-adnan-oktar-internet-ve-ozellestirilen-sansur-araclari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=213","title":{"rendered":"Bianet: Adnan Oktar, \u0130nternet ve \u00d6zelle\u015ftirilen Sans\u00fcr Ara\u00e7lar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bianet&#8217;te bu sabah yay\u0131nlanan ve Adnan Oktar taraf\u0131ndan sans\u00fcrlenmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lan yaz\u0131m\u0131zla ilgili yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z yaz\u0131. [Yaman Akdeniz]<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bianet.org\/bianet\/kategori\/bianet\/110541\/adnan-oktar-internet-ve-ozellestirilen-sansur-araclari\">Bianet: Adnan Oktar, \u0130nternet ve \u00d6zelle\u015ftirilen Sans\u00fcr Ara\u00e7lar\u0131<\/a>: &#8220;Adnan Oktar, \u0130nternet ve \u00d6zelle\u015ftirilen Sans\u00fcr Ara\u00e7lar\u0131<\/p>\n<p>Bug\u00fcne kadar 61 site hakk\u0131nda kapatma karar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayan Adnan Oktar&#8217;a uyan mahkemelerin kararlar\u0131n\u0131n hukuksuz oldu\u011funda \u0131srarl\u0131y\u0131z. 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 yasa kald\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131. Bu haliyle uygulama otosans\u00fcr tehlikesini getiriyor.<\/p>\n<p>B\u0130A Haber Merkezi &#8211; Ankara, 30 Ekim 2008, Per\u015fembe<\/p>\n<p><strong>Yaman AKDEN\u0130Z-Kerem ALTIPARMAK<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>bianet okuyucular\u0131n\u0131n yak\u0131ndan bildi\u011fi gibi Adnan Hoca lakapl\u0131 Adnan Oktar\u2019\u0131n seri bir \u015fekilde \u0130nternet sitelerine eri\u015fimi mahkeme kararlar\u0131 yoluyla kapatt\u0131rmas\u0131 \u00fczerine bianet\u2019te \u2018\u0130nternete Kar\u015f\u0131 Adnan Hoca: T\u00fcm Kapatmalar Hukuka Ayk\u0131r\u0131\u2019 ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir yaz\u0131y\u0131 20 Ekim 2008 tarihinde yay\u0131mlad\u0131k.<\/p>\n<p>D\u00fcn yine ayn\u0131 sitede yay\u0131mlanan bir habere g\u00f6re, Adnan Oktar\u2019\u0131n avukatlar\u0131 yaz\u0131m\u0131zda ba\u015fta \u2018Adnan Oktar (Harun Yahya) olmak \u00fczere bir\u00e7ok m\u00fcvekkilleri hakk\u0131nda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde bir tak\u0131m hakaretler ve iftiralar yer almakta\u2019 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Benzeri durumda, T\u00fcrk Mahkemelerinin ba\u015fta wordpress.com, richarddawkins.net, egitimsen.org.tr ve groups.google, gazetevatan.com sitesi olmak \u00fczere \u00e7ok say\u0131da \u0130nternet sitesine T\u00fcrkiye\u2019den eri\u015fimi yasaklad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 hat\u0131rlatan avukatlar, bianet\u2019e yaz\u0131m\u0131zdaki hakaretleri 24 saat i\u00e7inde yay\u0131ndan kald\u0131rmas\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilleri Adnan Oktar (Harun Yahya) ve Bilim Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Vakf\u0131 mensuplar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda bundan b\u00f6yle hakaret i\u00e7erikli hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 yay\u0131nlara sitede yer verilmemesini, aksi takdirde yarg\u0131 yoluyla bianet\u2019i de kapatt\u0131racaklar\u0131n\u0131 bildirmi\u015ftir.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nAvukatlar, bir sayfal\u0131k uyar\u0131 yaz\u0131lar\u0131nda \u2018Ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131, hakaret ve iftira olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece internet olabildi\u011fince \u00f6zg\u00fcr olmal\u0131\u2019 \u015feklinde form\u00fcle edilen kal\u0131pla\u015fm\u0131\u015f ifadeyi de tekrar etmi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n<p>bianet, bu uyar\u0131ya verdi\u011fi cevapta Adnan Oktar\u2019\u0131n kapatma tehdidiyle yay\u0131ndan yaz\u0131 kald\u0131rmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan yaz\u0131y\u0131 okuyanlar\u0131n rahatl\u0131kla tespit edebilecekleri gibi yaz\u0131da herhangi bir hakaret bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi bianet\u2019e yollanan uyar\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131nda s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen \u2018bir\u00e7ok m\u00fcvekkillerin\u2019 kim oldu\u011funu anlamak da zordur. Ancak o yaz\u0131n\u0131n yazarlar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan Adnan Oktar\u2019\u0131n yaz\u0131ya neden bu derece al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tahmin etmek de g\u00fc\u00e7 de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p>Yaz\u0131m\u0131zda \u00e7ok basit bir muhakeme tekni\u011fi y\u00fcr\u00fcterek ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z sonu\u00e7, uyar\u0131y\u0131 yollayan avukatlar\u0131n ald\u0131klar\u0131 eri\u015fimi engelleme kararlar\u0131n\u0131n 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 \u2018\u0130nternet Ortam\u0131nda Yap\u0131lan Yay\u0131nlar\u0131n D\u00fczenlenmesi ve bu Yay\u0131nlar Yoluyla \u0130\u015flenen Su\u00e7larla M\u00fccadele Edilmesi Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 9. maddesinin May\u0131s 2007 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesinden beri a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ortaya koyuyordu. Bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn yayg\u0131nla\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n, benzer kararlar\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 zorla\u015ft\u0131raca\u011f\u0131 muhakkakd\u0131r. Oysa avukatlar Bianet\u2019e yollad\u0131klar\u0131 yaz\u0131da \u2018Yap\u0131lan hukuki ba\u015fvurular neticesinde bir internet sitesinin herhangi bir sayfas\u0131nda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir yay\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 taktirde, teknik olarak sadece ilgili yay\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 sayfan\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 sa\u011flanamamakta ancak sitenin komple kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 yoluna gidilebil\u2019di\u011fini belirtmektedirler.<\/p>\n<p>Yaz\u0131m\u0131zda a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z \u00fczere, bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f tamamen yanl\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 9. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, hakaret i\u00e7erdi\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen i\u00e7eri\u011fin talep \u00fczerine \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmamas\u0131 sonras\u0131nda ki\u015fi onbe\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde yerle\u015fim yeri sulh ceza mahkemesine ba\u015fvurarak, i\u00e7eri\u011fin yay\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na ve yay\u0131ndaki kapsam\u0131ndan fazla olmamak \u00fczere haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 cevab\u0131n bir hafta s\u00fcreyle internet ortam\u0131nda yay\u0131mlanmas\u0131na karar verilmesini isteyebilir, sitenin kapat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 de\u011fil. 20 Ekim tarihli makalemizde de belirtti\u011fimiz gibi 9. madde\u2019de \u2018engelleme\u2019 ya da \u2018eri\u015fim engellemesi\u2019 tabirleri kullan\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f, sadece \u2018yay\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma\u2019 kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yeni kanunda, \u00f6zel hukuku ilgilendiren ki\u015fisel ili\u015fkilerde daha s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 ve eri\u015fim engelleme i\u00e7ermeyen bir yapt\u0131r\u0131m \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>5651 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa\u2019n\u0131n 9. maddesinin uygulanmas\u0131 halinde, bianet\u2019e yollanan tarzda uyar\u0131\/tehdit mesajlar\u0131n\u0131n yollanmas\u0131 da m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmayacakt\u0131r. Bu durumun, kapatma kararlar\u0131n\u0131 ellerinde g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir ara\u00e7 olarak kullananlar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan endi\u015fe yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anlamak zor olmasa gerekir. Bizim a\u00e7\u0131m\u0131zdan tart\u0131\u015fmaya gerek olmayan bu noktay\u0131 tekrar etmeye gerek g\u00f6rm\u00fcyoruz, isteyenler daha \u00f6nce yay\u0131nlad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z yaz\u0131dan ayr\u0131nt\u0131lara ula\u015fabilirler. Fakat Adnan Oktar\u2019\u0131n avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n yollad\u0131\u011f\u0131 uyar\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de son d\u00f6nemde geli\u015fen \u0130nternet sans\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen yan etkileri konusunda \u00f6nemli ipu\u00e7lar\u0131 verdi\u011fi i\u00e7in baz\u0131 hususlar\u0131 bu vesileyle vurgulamay\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcyoruz.<br \/>\n\u00d6zelle\u015ftirilmi\u015f sans\u00fcrden otosans\u00fcre<\/p>\n<p>    * \u0130nternet s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar\u0131, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yan\u0131nda Anayasa\u2019da daha g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir \u015fekilde korunan bilim \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc de tehdit eder hale gelmi\u015ftir. Bilindi\u011fi gibi Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 27. maddesine g\u00f6re, bilim yayma hakk\u0131, sadece Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 1., 2. ve 3. maddeleri h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesini sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla kullan\u0131lamaz. Oysa Richard Dawkins gibi d\u00fcnyaca tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f bir bilim insan\u0131n\u0131n sitesinden sonra tamamen akademik etik kurallar\u0131na uygun bir \u015fekilde iki hukuk\u00e7u akademisyen taraf\u0131ndan yaz\u0131lan bir yaz\u0131 eri\u015fimin engellenmesine gerek\u00e7e yap\u0131lmak istenmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>    * Sistematik kapatma kararlar\u0131 \u00f6zelle\u015ftirilmi\u015f bir eri\u015fim engelleme rejimi olu\u015fturmu\u015ftur. Ger\u00e7ekten \u00f6nceki yaz\u0131m\u0131zda belirtti\u011fimiz gibi Adnan Oktar tam 61 sitenin eri\u015fimini engelletmeyi ba\u015farm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu \u015fartlar alt\u0131nda bianet\u2019e yollanan tarzda bir mektubun ciddi bir tehdit olu\u015fturdu\u011fu ve bu gibi durumlarda genelde otosans\u00fcre yol a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Sadece \u0130nternet\u2019te yay\u0131n yapan bas\u0131n kurulu\u015flar\u0131 i\u00e7in de\u011fil aylarca kapal\u0131 kalmak, 2-3 g\u00fcnl\u00fck eri\u015fim engellemesinin bile sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 Blogger ve Blogspot\u2019a Digit\u00fcrk ba\u015fvurusu ile yap\u0131lan eri\u015fim engellemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gibi \u00e7ok a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131r. Daha ka\u00e7 siteye bu tarz ihbarlar\u0131n yolland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilemiyoruz ama bu \u015fartlar alt\u0131nda benzer uyar\u0131\/tehdidi alan bir\u00e7ok sitenin bianet gibi cesur ve dik durmamas\u0131na herhalde \u015fa\u015fmamak gerekir. A\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki hukuksal a\u00e7\u0131klamam\u0131z bu ihtimali daha da g\u00fc\u00e7lendirmektedir. G\u00f6r\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kadar\u0131yla \u0130nternet\u2019te ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc incelerken bu \u00f6zelle\u015ftirilmi\u015f sans\u00fcr s\u00fcrecini de dikkate almak gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>    * 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa\u2019n\u0131n ciddi bir g\u00f6zden ge\u00e7irmeye tabi tutulmas\u0131, hatta kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.(2) H\u00fck\u00fcmetin, AB\u2019den g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir bask\u0131 gelinceye kadar bunu yapmayaca\u011f\u0131 da g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Ama en az\u0131ndan 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa\u2019n\u0131n gere\u011fi gibi uygulanmas\u0131, 5651 d\u0131\u015f\u0131 eri\u015fim engellemelerini ve bunun yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6zelle\u015ftirilmi\u015f eri\u015fim engelleme rejimini b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde ortadan kald\u0131rabilir. Ne var ki, bu ilk bak\u0131\u015fta g\u00f6r\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kadar kolay de\u011fildir. \u015e\u00f6yle ki; her ne kadar, ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019ne yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurularda, baz\u0131 mahkemeler 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa\u2019n\u0131n 9. maddesi uyar\u0131nca g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 vermekteyse de (3), \u00f6zellikle Adnan Hoca kapatmalar\u0131nda oldu\u011fu gibi \u00e7ok say\u0131da Medeni Yasa\u2019ya g\u00f6re verilmi\u015f eri\u015fim yasa\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131 ak\u0131beti belirsiz bir \u015fekilde beklemektedir. Bu t\u00fcr tedbir kararlar\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan dava a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131p a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dava sonunda ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilip verilmedi\u011fi ve temyiz i\u00e7in Yarg\u0131tay\u2019a ba\u015fvurulup ba\u015fvurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirsizdir. Ancak as\u0131l sorun, Yarg\u0131tay\u2019da tedbir karar\u0131ndan y\u0131llar sonra yap\u0131lacak esasa ili\u015fkin incelemenin tedbir karar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan etkili bir ba\u015fvuru yolu olmamas\u0131d\u0131r. Verilen ihtiyati tedbir kararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda sitelerin eli kolu ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Bu \u015fartlar alt\u0131nda, Adnan Oktar tarz\u0131 kapatma taleplerinin say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n artmas\u0131 durumunda \u0130nternet gazetecili\u011finin bitece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>    * Bu sorunu a\u015fmak i\u00e7in \u00f6zelde \u0130nternet s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131rmalar\u0131 i\u00e7in, genelde ise yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131ndan kaynaklanan temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck ihlalleri i\u00e7in etkili hukuk yolu olu\u015fturulmas\u0131 bir zorunluluktur. A\u0130HM, Kulda\/Polonya (4) davas\u0131ndan beri S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen 6. maddesini ihlali durumunda da devletlerin i\u00e7 hukuklar\u0131nda etkili bir hukuk yolu \u00f6ng\u00f6rmeleri gerekti\u011fini belirtmektedir. Haks\u0131z bir tedbir karar\u0131yla t\u00fcm okuyucusunu kaybeden bir \u0130nternet sitesi i\u00e7in b\u00f6yle bir hukuk yolunun olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine herhalde \u015f\u00fcphe bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>    * T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik tehditler \u015fekil de\u011fi\u015ftirmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle, iddia edilenin aksine, bu alanda sorunlar\u0131n ge\u00e7mi\u015fte kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclemez. Bu yeni tehdit ara\u00e7lar\u0131ndan en \u00f6nemlisi hakaret davalar\u0131d\u0131r. Karikat\u00fcrlere sistematik davalar a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131rken de, \u0130nternet siteleri hakk\u0131nda ard\u0131 ard\u0131na engelleme talep edilirken de \u2018Ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131, hakaret ve iftira olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmamal\u0131\u2019 form\u00fcl\u00fc kullan\u0131lmakta, sonu\u00e7 kamusal akt\u00f6rlerin hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde ele\u015ftirilememesi olmaktad\u0131r. Bu y\u00f6nde yap\u0131lan her on talepten birinin ba\u015far\u0131ya ula\u015fmas\u0131 bile ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc tutsak k\u0131lmaya yetmektedir. Her yere bedava kitap yollayanlar kendilerini ele\u015ftiriye a\u00e7\u0131k hale getirmektedirler. O halde ele\u015ftiriyi de i\u00e7lerine sindirmeyi bilmelidirler, bilemiyorlarsa hukuk onlar\u0131 korumamal\u0131d\u0131r.(YA\/KA\/E\u00dc)<\/p>\n<p>* Yaman Akdeniz, Leeds \u00dcniversitesi Hukuk Fak\u00fcltesi.<br \/>\n* Kerem Alt\u0131parmak, Ankara \u00dcniversitesi, Siyasal Bilgiler Fak\u00fcltesi, \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Merkezi.<\/p>\n<p>Dipnotlar:<\/p>\n<p>(1) Bu ilkeli duru\u015flar\u0131 nedeniyle bianet\u2019teki dostlar\u0131m\u0131za te\u015fekk\u00fcr ederiz.<br \/>\n(2) Bu konuya ili\u015fkin olarak bu ay i\u00e7inde \u00e7\u0131kacak olan \u0130nternet: Girilmesi Tehlikeli ve Yasakt\u0131r (T\u00fcrkiye&#8217;de \u0130nternet \u0130\u00e7erik D\u00fczenlemesi ve Sans\u00fcre \u0130li\u015fkin Ele\u015ftirel Bir De\u011ferlendirme) isimli \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmam\u0131za bak\u0131labilir. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma pdf format\u0131nda \u0130nternet\u2019te de yay\u0131mlanacakt\u0131r.<br \/>\n(3) \u0130yi bir \u00f6rnek i\u00e7in bkz. Vatan Gazetesi, \u2018Ek\u015fis\u00f6zl\u00fck\u2019de takipsizlik karar\u0131\u2019, 17.10.2008.<br \/>\n(4) Kulda\/Polonya [B\u00fcy\u00fck Daire], no. 30210\/96, ECHR 2000-XI. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bianet&#8217;te bu sabah yay\u0131nlanan ve Adnan Oktar taraf\u0131ndan sans\u00fcrlenmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lan yaz\u0131m\u0131zla ilgili yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z yaz\u0131. [Yaman Akdeniz] Bianet: Adnan Oktar, \u0130nternet ve \u00d6zelle\u015ftirilen Sans\u00fcr Ara\u00e7lar\u0131: &#8220;Adnan Oktar, \u0130nternet ve \u00d6zelle\u015ftirilen Sans\u00fcr Ara\u00e7lar\u0131 Bug\u00fcne kadar 61 site hakk\u0131nda kapatma karar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayan Adnan Oktar&#8217;a uyan mahkemelerin kararlar\u0131n\u0131n hukuksuz oldu\u011funda \u0131srarl\u0131y\u0131z. 5651 say\u0131l\u0131 yasa kald\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131. Bu haliyle uygulama otosans\u00fcr tehlikesini getiriyor. B\u0130A Haber&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[22,34,5,21,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-213","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-5651-nolu-kanun","category-adnan-hoca","category-dusunce-ozgurlugu","category-erisim-engelleme","category-hakaret"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7wjA8-3r","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=213"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=213"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=213"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=213"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}