{"id":281,"date":"2008-12-03T21:47:17","date_gmt":"2008-12-03T18:47:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=281"},"modified":"2008-12-03T21:47:20","modified_gmt":"2008-12-03T18:47:20","slug":"gazeteport-yarsavdan-genel-dinlemeye-itiraz","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=281","title":{"rendered":"Gazeteport: YARSAV’dan genel dinlemeye itiraz"},"content":{"rendered":"

Gazeteport: YARSAV’dan genel dinlemeye itiraz<\/a><\/p>\n

03.12.2008 – 16:27<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131\u00e7lar ve Savc\u0131lar Birli\u011fi, istihbarat birimleri taraf\u0131ndan \u00fclke genelinde izleme, ileti\u015fimin tespiti ve sinyal bilgilerinin de\u011ferlendirilmesine y\u00f6nelik karar\u0131n iptal edilmemesi \u00fczerine bug\u00fcn, Sincan A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve iddianame d\u00fczenlenmesi i\u00e7in itirazda bulundu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131.
\n
\nANKARA – Yarg\u0131\u00e7lar ve Savc\u0131lar Birli\u011fi (YARSAV), istihbarat birimleri taraf\u0131ndan \u00fclke genelinde izleme, ileti\u015fimin tespiti ve sinyal bilgilerinin de\u011ferlendirilmesine y\u00f6nelik karar\u0131n iptal edilmemesi \u00fczerine bug\u00fcn, Sincan A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve iddianame d\u00fczenlenmesi i\u00e7in itirazda bulundu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131.<\/p>\n

YARSAV\u2019dan yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamada, istihbarat birimlerine \u00fclke genelinde izleme, ileti\u015fimin tesbiti ve sinyal bilgilerinin de\u011ferlendirilmesine y\u00f6nelik olarak verilen izin karar\u0131yla ilgili olarak 6 Haziran 2008 tarihinde Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunuldu\u011fu, 31 Ekim\u2019de ise \u201ckovu\u015fturmaya yer\u201d olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131.
\nYARSAV, s\u00f6z konusu karara kar\u015f\u0131 Sincan A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019nca karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve iddianame d\u00fczenlenmesi i\u00e7in bug\u00fcn itirazda bulunuldu\u011fu bildirildi.
\nA\u00e7\u0131klamada, Telekom\u00fcnikasyon \u0130leti\u015fim Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n 4 Haziran 2008 tarihli bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131ndan, JGK d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda M\u0130T ve EGM taraf\u0131ndan \u00fclke genelinde periyodik olarak \u00fc\u00e7er ayl\u0131k s\u00fcrelerle sinyal bilgilerinin de\u011ferlendirilmesi, ileti\u015fimin tespiti ve izleme konusunda kararlar al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu kararlar\u0131n uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenilmesi \u00fczerine; konu hakk\u0131nda Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunuldu\u011fu an\u0131msat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

\u201cADALET BAKANLI\u011eI SORU\u015eTURMANIN ETK\u0130NL\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130 ZEDELED\u0130\u201d
\n\u0130zleme ve dinlemeye y\u00f6nelik somut verilerin de sunuldu\u011fu kaydedilen a\u00e7\u0131klamada, bir tutuklama karar\u0131nda isim, su\u00e7 ve gerek\u00e7enin yer almas\u0131 zorunlulu\u011funun bulundu\u011funa dikkat \u00e7ekilerek, genel bir tutuklama karar\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131 olanakl\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na i\u015faret edildi.
\nA\u00e7\u0131klamada, \u201cSu\u00e7 \u00f6ncesi izleme kararlar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de durum ayn\u0131d\u0131r. Bu nedenle genel nitelikteki izleme kararlar\u0131n\u0131n infaz yetene\u011fi bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle bir mahkeme karar\u0131na dayansa bile infaz\u0131 olanakl\u0131 olmayan bu kararlarla ilgili su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunulmu\u015f; ancak bu soru\u015fturma devam ederken \u2018yasa yarar\u0131na bozma yolundan\u2019 uzak duran Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca, bu sefer soru\u015fturmay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131 hakk\u0131nda m\u00fcfetti\u015f g\u00f6revlendirilmi\u015f ve soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkinli\u011fi zedelenmi\u015ftir\u201d denildi.<\/p>\n

\u201cADALET BAKANLI\u011eI\u2019NA BA\u015eVURUDA BULUNULDU\u201d
\nM\u0130T ve Emniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc (EGM) ile ilgili kararlar\u0131n iptali i\u00e7in 6 Haziran\u2019da Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilen a\u00e7\u0131klamada, Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n 22 Eyl\u00fcl 2008 tarihinde bir yan\u0131t g\u00f6ndererek, M\u0130T ve EGM hakk\u0131ndaki kararlar\u0131n s\u00fcresinin doldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle \u201cbu yola\u201d gitmeyece\u011fini belirtti\u011fi kaydedildi. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na yap\u0131lan ikinci ba\u015fvuruda ise mutlaka yasa yarar\u0131na bozma yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin belirtildi\u011fi ifade edilen a\u00e7\u0131klamada, s\u00f6z konusu ba\u015fvuruya yan\u0131t bile al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, 1 Aral\u0131k\u2019ta M\u00fcste\u015far\u2019dan istenen randevu talebinin de yan\u0131ts\u0131z kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurguland\u0131. A\u00e7\u0131klamada, \u201cYasa yarar\u0131na bozma yoluna ba\u015fvurmayan Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n, bu konudaki soru\u015fturmay\u0131 da kapsar bi\u00e7imde soru\u015fturma savc\u0131s\u0131 hakk\u0131nda m\u00fcfetti\u015f g\u00f6revlendirmesi, hukuk devleti ilkeleriyle ba\u011fda\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, bu konuda 3 Aral\u0131k 2008 tarihinde Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na Bilgi Edinme Hakk\u0131 Yasas\u0131 uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvuruda bulunulmu\u015ftur\u201d denildi.<\/p>\n

61 B\u0130N AVUKAT \u0130ZLENEB\u0130LECEK
\nA\u00e7\u0131klamada, 5397 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa kapsam\u0131nda verilen izleme kararlar\u0131 nedeniyle T\u00fcrkiye\u2019deki halen g\u00f6revde olan 11 bin yarg\u0131\u00e7 ve savc\u0131, 15 Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00dcyesi, 250 Yarg\u0131tay \u00dcyesi, 90 Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u00dcyesi, 61 bin Avukat i\u00e7in de izlenme olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fdu\u011fu kaydedildi.
\nA\u00e7\u0131klamada, \u201cBu ba\u011flamda \u00fclkedeki herkes \u2018ter\u00f6r \u015f\u00fcphesi\u2019 alt\u0131na sokularak izleme kapsam\u0131na dahil edilmi\u015ftir. Hi\u00e7bir yarg\u0131\u00e7 ve savc\u0131 su\u00e7 \u00f6ncesi izleme ve ileti\u015fim tespiti kapsam\u0131na sokulamazken, bu durum yarg\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli iken, b\u00f6yle bir olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n yarat\u0131lmas\u0131 bile son derece vahimdir. Ergenekon olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan davay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten mahkeme ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n bu konudaki s\u00f6zleri, yarg\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden son derece \u00f6nemlidir. \u00dcstelik 5397 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa uyar\u0131nca elde edilen su\u00e7 \u00f6ncesi (istihbari) verilerin adli soru\u015fturmalarda kullan\u0131lamamas\u0131 gerekirken, bu verilerin imha edilmeyerek adli soru\u015fturmalarda kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 yoluna gidilmesi ise \u00fczerinde ayr\u0131ca durulmas\u0131 gereken bir konudur\u201d denildi.<\/p>\n

ADALET BAKANLI\u011eI M\u00dcSTE\u015eARI HAKKINDA SU\u00c7 DUYURUSU
\nA\u00e7\u0131klamada, ayr\u0131ca g\u00f6rev gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket edilmesi nedeniyle Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 M\u00fcste\u015far\u0131, ilgili M\u00fcste\u015far Yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 ve Ceza \u0130\u015fleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc hakk\u0131nda bug\u00fcn Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k Kurulu\u2019na \u201cg\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmak su\u00e7undan\u201d i\u015flem yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunuldu\u011fu bildirildi. A\u00e7\u0131klamada \u015f\u00f6yle denildi:
\n\u201cBir hukuk devletinde her t\u00fcrl\u00fc i\u015f ve i\u015flemin hukukun \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde yap\u0131lmas\u0131, hukuk devletinin s\u00f6ylemde kalmayarak eyleme ge\u00e7irilmesi gerekmektedir. Yarg\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n evrensel \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlere ula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131, hukukun \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, etkinli\u011fi ve egemenli\u011fini ama\u00e7 edinen YARSAV\u2019\u0131n bu ama\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda faaliyetlerine devam edece\u011fi kamuoyunun bilgisine sunulur.\u201d (ANKA)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Gazeteport: YARSAV’dan genel dinlemeye itiraz 03.12.2008 – 16:27 Yarg\u0131\u00e7lar ve Savc\u0131lar Birli\u011fi, istihbarat birimleri taraf\u0131ndan \u00fclke genelinde izleme, ileti\u015fimin tespiti ve sinyal bilgilerinin de\u011ferlendirilmesine y\u00f6nelik karar\u0131n iptal edilmemesi \u00fczerine bug\u00fcn, Sincan A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve iddianame d\u00fczenlenmesi i\u00e7in itirazda bulundu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[15,19,14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-281","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gizli-dinleme","category-izleme","category-telekulak"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7wjA8-4x","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=281"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=281"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=281"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=281"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}