{"id":326,"date":"2009-01-30T00:12:38","date_gmt":"2009-01-29T21:12:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=326"},"modified":"2009-01-30T00:12:41","modified_gmt":"2009-01-29T21:12:41","slug":"hurriyet-basbakanin-telekulak-yetkisi-iptal-edildi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=326","title":{"rendered":"H\u00fcrriyet: Ba\u015fbakan&#8217;\u0131n telekulak yetkisi iptal edildi"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.hurriyet.com.tr\/gundem\/10883229.asp?gid=233\">Ba\u015fbakan&#8217;\u0131n yetkisi iptal edildi &#8211; H\u00fcrriyet<\/a>: &#8220;Ba\u015fbakan&#8217;\u0131n yetkisi iptal edildi<br \/>\n\t29 Ocak 2009<br \/>\nA.A<br \/>\nBa\u015fbakan&#8217;\u0131n yetkisi iptal edildi<br \/>\nAnayasa Mahkemesi, M\u0130T, polis ve jandarmaya telekom\u00fcnikasyon yoluyla yap\u0131lan ileti\u015fimi tespit, dinleme ve kaydetme konusunda yetki veren kanunun, \u2018Dinlemelerde faaliyetlerin denetiminin, ba\u015fbakan\u0131n \u00f6zel olarak yetkilendirece\u011fi ki\u015fi veya komisyon taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131\u2019 \u00f6ng\u00f6ren h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc iptal etti.<\/p>\n<p>Bilgi Teknolojileri ve \u0130leti\u015fim Kurumu Ba\u015fkan\u0131 ne dedi<\/p>\n<p>10. Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 Ahmet Necdet Sezer, polis, jandarma ve M\u0130T&#8217;e telekom\u00fcnikasyon yoluyla yap\u0131lan ileti\u015fimi tespit, dinleme ve kaydetme konusunda yetki veren 3 Temmuz 2005 tarihli 5397 say\u0131l\u0131 Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Kanun&#8217;un baz\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin iptali ve y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn durdurulmas\u0131 istemiyle Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nde dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Anayasa Mahkemesi heyeti, bug\u00fcnk\u00fc g\u00fcndem toplant\u0131s\u0131nda, davay\u0131 esastan karara ba\u011flad\u0131.<br \/>\nY\u00fcksek Mahkeme, kanun ile Polis Vazife ve Selahiyet Kanunu, Jandarma Te\u015fkilat, G\u00f6rev ve Yetkileri Kanunu ve Devlet \u0130stihbarat Hizmetleri ve Milli \u0130stihbarat Te\u015fkilat\u0131 Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen, \u201cDinleme faaliyetlerinin denetiminin Ba\u015fbakan\u0131n \u00f6zel olarak yetkilendirece\u011fi ki\u015fi veya komisyon taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131\u201d \u00f6ng\u00f6ren h\u00fckm\u00fc iptal etti.<\/p>\n<p>Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, \u201cTelekom\u00fcnikasyon \u0130leti\u015fim Ba\u015fkan\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n, Telekom\u00fcnikasyon Kurumu Ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n teklifi \u00fczerine Ba\u015fbakan taraf\u0131ndan atanaca\u011f\u0131na\u201d ili\u015fkin h\u00fckm\u00fc de Anayasa&#8217;ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 buldu.<\/p>\n<p>Anayasa Mahkemesi iptali istenen \u201cBir ba\u015fkan ile teknik, hukuk ve idari olmak \u00fczere \u00fc\u00e7 uzmandan olu\u015faca\u011f\u0131\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcne ili\u015fkin yeni bir yasal d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n<p>Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme&#8217;nin karar\u0131n\u0131 oy birli\u011fiyle ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenildi.<\/p>\n<p>Y\u00dcR\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011e\u00dcN DURDURULMASINA RET<\/p>\n<p>Anayasa Mahkemesi, telefon dinlemenin denetimine ili\u015fkin iptal etti\u011fi yasa h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn durdurulmas\u0131 istemlerini reddetti.<\/p>\n<p>10. Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 Ahmet Necdet Sezer, polis, jandarma ve M\u0130T&#8217;e telekom\u00fcnikasyon yoluyla yap\u0131lan ileti\u015fimi tespit, dinleme ve kaydetme konusunda yetki veren 3 Temmuz 2005 tarihli 5397 say\u0131l\u0131 Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Kanun&#8217;un baz\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin iptali ve y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn durdurulmas\u0131 istemiyle Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nde dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>5397 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunun, dinlemenin denetiminin ba\u015fbakan\u0131n \u00f6zel olarak yetkilendirece\u011fi ki\u015fi veya komisyon taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na olanak sa\u011flayan h\u00fckm\u00fc ile telekom\u00fcnikasyon ileti\u015fim ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fbakan taraf\u0131ndan atanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc oy birli\u011fiyle iptal eden Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin durdurulmas\u0131 istemini ise \u201cko\u015fullar olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan\u201d reddetti.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\n \u201cMevcut ba\u015fkan g\u00f6revine devam eder\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Adalet Eski Bakanlar\u0131ndan Hikmet Sami T\u00fcrk, Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin bug\u00fcn ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararlara a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k getirdi.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkeme\u2019nin iki ayr\u0131 karar ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klayan T\u00fcrk, bunlardan birinin Ba\u015fbakan\u2019\u0131n \u0130leti\u015fim Dairesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131\u2019n\u0131 atama yetkisi oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi. T\u00fcrk, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 22. maddesinin ileti\u015fimin mahremiyetini g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 an\u0131msatt\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Dinlemeye ge\u00e7it veren kurumun ba\u015f\u0131na ataman\u0131n Ba\u015fbakan onay\u0131yla yap\u0131lmas\u0131 durumunda, dinlemelerin siyasi etki alt\u0131nda kalma olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 bulundu\u011funa dikkat \u00e7eken T\u00fcrk, \u201cBu bug\u00fcne kadar b\u00f6yle oldu\u011fu anlam\u0131na gelmez. Ancak Anayasa Mahkemesi olas\u0131 siyasi dinlemelerin \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7mek i\u00e7in b\u00f6yle bir karar alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r, diye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyorum\u201d dedi.<\/p>\n<p>T\u00fcrk, mevcut daire ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6revine devam edebilece\u011fini ancak daha sonra g\u00f6reve gelecek ba\u015fkanlar\u0131n Ba\u015fbakan onay\u0131yla atanamayacaklar\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7izdi.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkeme Karar\u0131n\u0131n Resmi Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan gerek\u00e7enin netle\u015fece\u011fini belirten T\u00fcrk, Resmi Gazete\u2019de h\u00fck\u00fcmete yeni bir yasa \u00e7\u0131karmas\u0131 i\u00e7in s\u00fcre tan\u0131nanaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da an\u0131msatt\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Bug\u00fcn Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin ayr\u0131ca 205 y\u0131l\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren M\u0130T, Emniyet ve Jandarma y\u00f6neticilerinin ve yard\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131na gerekti\u011finde genel dinleme yetkisi veren yasan\u0131n iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davay\u0131 da esastan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeye karar verdi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n<p>S\u00f6z konusu yasan\u0131n 72 milyonun tamam\u0131n\u0131 dinleme yetkisi verdi\u011fine i\u015faret eden T\u00fcrk, \u201cMahkeme, Anayasada temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinden olan haberle\u015fme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal edici bir d\u00fczenleme olarak de\u011ferlendirerek, esastan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeye karar vermi\u015ftir\u201d dedi.<\/p>\n<p>Aysel ALP-ANKARA<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ba\u015fbakan&#8217;\u0131n yetkisi iptal edildi &#8211; H\u00fcrriyet: &#8220;Ba\u015fbakan&#8217;\u0131n yetkisi iptal edildi 29 Ocak 2009 A.A Ba\u015fbakan&#8217;\u0131n yetkisi iptal edildi Anayasa Mahkemesi, M\u0130T, polis ve jandarmaya telekom\u00fcnikasyon yoluyla yap\u0131lan ileti\u015fimi tespit, dinleme ve kaydetme konusunda yetki veren kanunun, \u2018Dinlemelerde faaliyetlerin denetiminin, ba\u015fbakan\u0131n \u00f6zel olarak yetkilendirece\u011fi ki\u015fi veya komisyon taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131\u2019 \u00f6ng\u00f6ren h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc iptal etti. Bilgi Teknolojileri ve \u0130leti\u015fim Kurumu Ba\u015fkan\u0131 ne dedi&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[15,19,10,14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-326","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gizli-dinleme","category-izleme","category-mahremiyet","category-telekulak"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7wjA8-5g","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/326","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=326"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/326\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=326"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=326"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=326"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}