{"id":85,"date":"2008-08-22T00:58:40","date_gmt":"2008-08-21T21:58:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=85"},"modified":"2008-08-22T01:05:17","modified_gmt":"2008-08-21T22:05:17","slug":"danistayin-telekulak-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/?p=85","title":{"rendered":"Dan\u0131\u015ftay’\u0131n Telekulak Karar\u0131!"},"content":{"rendered":"

internetajans<\/a>: Dan\u0131\u015ftay’\u0131n Telekulak Karar\u0131!<\/p>\n

Dan\u0131\u015ftay’\u0131n Karar\u0131na buradan ula\u015fabilirsiniz: \u0130tiraz No:2008\/159<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

‘Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yetkili de\u011fil’…
\nDan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130dari Dava Daireleri Kurulu, telefon dinleme ve teknik takip konusunda Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n y\u00f6netmelik \u00e7\u0131karmaya yetkisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna vard\u0131. Soru\u015fturmalarda bu y\u00f6ntemin kullan\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in yeniden y\u00f6netmelik \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekecek. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ge\u00e7en y\u0131l, Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’ndaki telefon dinleme ve teknik takip ile \u00f6rg\u00fctl\u00fc su\u00e7larda ajan kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini somutla\u015ft\u0131rmak i\u00e7in y\u00f6netmelik \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Y\u00f6netmelik, su\u00e7lular\u0131n birinci derece yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n teknik takibi ve dinlenmesini de i\u00e7eriyordu. \u0130stanbul Barosu bunun hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin iptali i\u00e7in Dan\u0131\u015ftay’a dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Dan\u0131\u015ftay 10’uncu Dairesi, dava sonunda \u015f\u00fcphelilerin birinci derece yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n da dinlenebilmesine ili\u015fkin y\u00f6netmelik h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn y\u00fcr\u00fctmesini durdurmu\u015ftu. Bakanl\u0131k, Daire’nin bu karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130dari Dava Daireleri Kurulu’na temyiz etti. Kurul, Daire’nin karar\u0131n\u0131, oybirli\u011fiyle kald\u0131rd\u0131.<\/p>\n

YETK\u0130 SINIRI<\/p>\n

\u0130lk bak\u0131\u015fta Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n lehine g\u00f6r\u00fcnen bu karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n b\u00f6yle bir y\u00f6netmelik \u00e7\u0131karma yetkisinin bile olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na i\u015faret edildi. Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n yetki s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespiti yap\u0131lan kararda yasan\u0131n, bu alanda bir y\u00f6netmelik \u00e7\u0131karmak i\u00e7in Bakanl\u0131\u011fa bir yetki de vermedi\u011fi belirtildi. Bu karar telefon dinleme ve teknik takibi imk\u00e2ns\u0131z hale getirmeyecek. Ancak bu konularda sorun ya\u015fanmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nda hangi idari makam\u0131n y\u00f6netmelik \u00e7\u0131karaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin de\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekecek.<\/p>\n

22.07.2008 12:02:00″<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

internetajans: Dan\u0131\u015ftay’\u0131n Telekulak Karar\u0131! Dan\u0131\u015ftay’\u0131n Karar\u0131na buradan ula\u015fabilirsiniz: \u0130tiraz No:2008\/159 ‘Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yetkili de\u011fil’… Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130dari Dava Daireleri Kurulu, telefon dinleme ve teknik takip konusunda Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n y\u00f6netmelik \u00e7\u0131karmaya yetkisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna vard\u0131. Soru\u015fturmalarda bu y\u00f6ntemin kullan\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in yeniden y\u00f6netmelik \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekecek. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ge\u00e7en y\u0131l, Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’ndaki telefon dinleme ve teknik takip ile \u00f6rg\u00fctl\u00fc su\u00e7larda ajan kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[10,14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-85","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-mahremiyet","category-telekulak"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7wjA8-1n","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=85"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=85"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=85"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=85"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}